Author Topic: Why not Brook Lopez?  (Read 4256 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Why not Brook Lopez?
« on: February 12, 2014, 02:39:36 PM »

Offline JR47

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 15
  • Tommy Points: 1
Trade Green/Bass to Brooklyn for Brook Lopez.(Works in trade machine)

Brooklyn - continues to push all of their chips to the center of the table for a shot to win this year. Probably inserts Bass into the starting lineup with KG at the 5. Jeff Green probably thrives in a 6th man role.

Boston- Gets a center to pair long term with Sully (who grows on me more and more each game).  Improves their now biggest asset (2014 pick) by probably losing a bunch more games. The trade opens up minutes at SF to re sign Pierce as a FA.(bonus!)

The obvious hold up is the health of Brook Lopez, but is the juice worth the squeeze?

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2014, 02:45:14 PM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
that is a very big gamble by the Nets, and it allows us to get rid of both Green and Bass for a quality starting center who will not help us this year.

I kinda like it for some reason if it is a straight up trade

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2014, 03:05:23 PM »

Offline minijericho29

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 158
  • Tommy Points: 24
Lopez is the best offensive center in the ENTIRE league and he is still young.  You want Brooklyn to mortgage their future to assemble the 2013 Celtics that got dominated by the Knicks in the playoffs last year?  Brooklyn would be crazy to this. 

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2014, 03:08:31 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Lopez is the best offensive center in the ENTIRE league and he is still young.  You want Brooklyn to mortgage their future to assemble the 2013 Celtics that got dominated by the Knicks in the playoffs last year?  Brooklyn would be crazy to this.

25 isn't that young... DeMarcus Cousins is a clearly better player and Center offensively... Hes also a far better passer, and is 23, playing in a tougher conference.

"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2014, 03:09:16 PM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10329
  • Tommy Points: 465
I would be afraid of Lopez continuing foot problems
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2014, 03:11:32 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19675
  • Tommy Points: 1622
Lopez is the best offensive center in the ENTIRE league and he is still young.  You want Brooklyn to mortgage their future to assemble the 2013 Celtics that got dominated by the Knicks in the playoffs last year?  Brooklyn would be crazy to this.

25 isn't that young... DeMarcus Cousins is a clearly better player and Center offensively... Hes also a far better passer, and is 23, playing in a tougher conference.

I am concerned about Lopez's injury history.  I would agree I would rather see Cousins.  If Stevens could somehow help with Cousins mental maturity....

does a Sully / Cousins front court work?

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2014, 03:14:08 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Lopez is the best offensive center in the ENTIRE league and he is still young.  You want Brooklyn to mortgage their future to assemble the 2013 Celtics that got dominated by the Knicks in the playoffs last year?  Brooklyn would be crazy to this.

25 isn't that young... DeMarcus Cousins is a clearly better player and Center offensively... Hes also a far better passer, and is 23, playing in a tougher conference.

I am concerned about Lopez's injury history.  I would agree I would rather see Cousins.  If Stevens could somehow help with Cousins mental maturity....

does a Sully / Cousins front court work?

It can, but it'll never happen. I seriously doubt we're going to ever get Cousins. Last year was our best chance in offering Bradley/Green/ some picks for Cousins, but now hes developing more and more. Hes also taking on a more matured leadership.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2014, 03:15:01 PM »

Offline JR47

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 15
  • Tommy Points: 1
Lopez is the best offensive center in the ENTIRE league and he is still young.  You want Brooklyn to mortgage their future to assemble the 2013 Celtics that got dominated by the Knicks in the playoffs last year?  Brooklyn would be crazy to this.

Brooklyn is crazy, they traded away three years worth of 1st round draft picks for a chance to win this year.

I'd say after that trade they would be a much better team than the playoff 2013 Rondo-less Celtics.  Give the 2013 Celtics Deron Williams, Joe Johnson, AK47, and Blatche....and tell me they would not have made a run at it.

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2014, 03:15:08 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63096
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I would be afraid of Lopez continuing foot problems

Same here.

He's got potentially career-ending foot problems, he's owed too much money, he's not a good rebounder (and in general, not a good defender) and he wouldn't be a good fit next to Sully.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2014, 03:19:26 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53035
  • Tommy Points: 2574
I would be worried about Sully + B.Lopez defensively. Pretty slow combination. Need to run your offense through your bigs offensively in the halfcourt too. Not ideal for Rondo.

I think B.Lopez is a guy you want to finish your team off. A third option type. A complementary star. Rather than a building block. A score first player who doesn't effect the game in enough ways to be a top of line star talent. So I think this would be the wrong phase in Boston's development to bring a complementary star like B.Lopez in. They need to get that marquee player first.

Throw in the injury worries and I am strongly against pursuing B.Lopez.

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2014, 03:25:32 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10156
  • Tommy Points: 350
Because he's injury prone and a bad defender.
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'

You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.

C.S. Lewis

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2014, 03:36:59 PM »

Offline Geo123

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1470
  • Tommy Points: 33
Trade Green/Bass to Brooklyn for Brook Lopez.(Works in trade machine)

Brooklyn - continues to push all of their chips to the center of the table for a shot to win this year. Probably inserts Bass into the starting lineup with KG at the 5. Jeff Green probably thrives in a 6th man role.

Boston- Gets a center to pair long term with Sully (who grows on me more and more each game).  Improves their now biggest asset (2014 pick) by probably losing a bunch more games. The trade opens up minutes at SF to re sign Pierce as a FA.(bonus!)

The obvious hold up is the health of Brook Lopez, but is the juice worth the squeeze?

The answer to your question is because it would be a very bad move.   He has a big contract, can't stay healthy, can't rebound,  and is injury prone. Besides those reasons there are no reasons at all...

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2014, 03:46:02 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
He's a 7 footer who rebounds at a similar rate to Jeff Green, he's horribly injury prone, he's due over $15M, and thenets would never do it.

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2014, 03:47:04 PM »

Offline minijericho29

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 158
  • Tommy Points: 24
He's a 7 footer who rebounds at a similar rate to Jeff Green, he's horribly injury prone, he's due over $15M, and thenets would never do it.

TP for the wit.

Re: Why not Brook Lopez?
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2014, 03:48:52 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Would anyone take Brook Lopez over Avery Bradley in a bet over who plays more regular season games in the three seasons after this one?
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference