0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Lance Stephenson because he was born ready.
Stephenson at that price.If you drop Bradley down several pay rungs like I believe he'll end up, then I think its more of a toss up.Probably still Bradley, I'd rather not committ major money to Stephenson type player when then C's are in rebuilding mode.
Quote from: Fafnir on January 13, 2014, 11:31:42 AMStephenson at that price.If you drop Bradley down several pay rungs like I believe he'll end up, then I think its more of a toss up.Probably still Bradley, I'd rather not committ major money to Stephenson type player when then C's are in rebuilding mode.Fair point.Going with a cheaper Bradley (say $26mill/4 years) vs Stephenson at $40mill/4 years, does it make the decision easier?
Quote from: BleedGreen1989 on January 13, 2014, 11:35:17 AMQuote from: Fafnir on January 13, 2014, 11:31:42 AMStephenson at that price.If you drop Bradley down several pay rungs like I believe he'll end up, then I think its more of a toss up.Probably still Bradley, I'd rather not committ major money to Stephenson type player when then C's are in rebuilding mode.Fair point.Going with a cheaper Bradley (say $26mill/4 years) vs Stephenson at $40mill/4 years, does it make the decision easier?I'd probably go Bradley in that instance.
Neither at those prices.I don't want the Celtics to spend that type of money on the complimentary pieces until the star core is in place. (with an exception possible for a starting quality C)