Author Topic: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?  (Read 12687 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2014, 03:16:06 AM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
Danny won't give up a 1st so likely a third team has to be involved

The deal that would work

To Cavs: Green
To Rockets: Varajao
To Celtics: Asik

But Cavs are hesitant to give up Varajao

Idk why everyone is so high on Asik.  Yes, I get the value of 'rim protection' or whatever the kids are calling it these days, but the guy has no offensive talent at all and is, iirc, a pretty bad free throw shooter.  I do like your idea, though.  Cle wants to make the playoffs, and we need to get a great pick, so what would you think of a situation where we somehow facilitate a trade for Bynum (if he came here he'd have to be waived immediately.  Sorry.  No fakers or bush league types on this team, please) where we give up Bradley and Green (probably to Cle) for Sacremento's 2014 1st rounder?  I like Avery, but we all know about the extension issue, and he's a very one dimensional and selfish offensive player, who, at best, looks like he'll be a more consistent (with a much better temperament) version of John Starks + Lindsay Hunter, long term.  That could work well for the Cavs though, since they want to move Waiters anyway.  Idt the salaries match, so maybe throw Bogans in too?  Bass deserves to go to a contender, I just don't know who that team is right now (not Mia, obviously).

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2014, 03:31:25 AM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
How about Bayless for Melo? ;D
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2014, 04:32:41 AM »

Offline aporel#18

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2332
  • Tommy Points: 170
I'd rather try to help Morey dump Asik on OKC. Those kids can score even if they weren't trying, and a player with no offensive game like Asik would be perfect for them. Asik is what Perk was supposed to be for them, but healthy, more mobile and a bit worse shooter.

Asik to OKC
Perk+PJ3+Dallas/OKC pick to Boston
Bass+Bogans to Houston

I don't want Asik in Celtic green, but if we traded for him and Morey insists on a pick, I'd do this:

Bass+Bogans+LAC pick to Houston
Asik+Motiejunas+rights to Llull/Papanikolau to Boston


We've discussed this a lot, but Bass is not only a better player than Asik, but he's also more valuable for Houston with Dwightmare on board. And he's on a much better contract. If Morey didn't outsmart himself with the contracts he gave to Lin and Asik, Asik would be out of Texas long ago. Motiejunas and the rights to either Llull or Papanikolau are enough to balance the trade.

How about Bayless for Melo? ;D

I thought Fab was a FA  ;)

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #18 on: January 06, 2014, 04:43:49 AM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
Given Bogans has been on the team all year and is quite expendable, don't you think this would have already been discussed by Ainge and Morey and soundly rejected?

If all the Rockets wanted was salary relief, I believe Asik would have been gone already.

I think they would have discussed it but I don't think Danny takes on Asik without having Lee gone first. That was the sticking point- Danny didn't want Lee, and neither did Morey.

Understand that the pressure here on is on the Rockets.

Danny knows that Morey is going to move Asik by the February deadline. He's got 6 weeks to trade him or they'll be paying Asik 20 million over 2 years as a chair warmer for Dwight Howard who does not want to play behind Dwight. I think salary relief and not going over the cap are definitely his main objectives.

The longer Ainge waits, the more desperate Morey will become and he'll settle for something like a Bass+Bogans deal for the salary relief. Is anyone giving up a first round pick for this guy? I doubt it.

Danny is in the drivers seat either way you look at it.
My take on the situation is simple:

Morey declined Lee, knowing that Bogans+Bass was an option if they couldn't get a deal done by December 19th.
Danny wasn't prepared to do anything unless Lee was gone whilst putting pressure on Morey to eventually accept his terms.

Judging from business negotiations I have had that's not how it works. That thinking, and please don't take this the wrong way, is too narrow minded for business. A much wider view of the entire situation is usually taken and talked about by both sides. I am 1000% sure Danny wasn't thinking I have to get rid of Lee first and only then will I make a Bogans Bass trade. As I said, that's just not very smart business.

If you have a product and want to sell it for a dollar but decide you can live with selling it for 90 cents and no less, if someone wants to negotiate the price they will come in at 75 cents go to 85 cents and then the real negotiations begin.

Bogans Bass is a 75 cent offer.
Bogans Lee is an 85 cent offer.
Bogans Lee and a pick is probably a 95 cent to one dollar offer.

I am sure both parties discussed what their end game was here and needs. I am sure multiple offers and demands were put on the table in both directions and after several long discussions Morey and Ainge came to their final offers and neither was good enough.

If Bass Lee wasn't good enough in a completely manufactured deadline infused market like Morey created, I am sure a lesser offer isn't going to get the job done now.

Nick I'm not offended at all. I'm actually a negotiator by profession and make (reasonably large) deals for a living...so I understand what you're saying. Now that I've tooted my own horn a bit more...

My analysis of this situation is that Ainge has had the upper hand the whole time. Morey is trying to control what he can and doing a good job of marketing his overpaid goon Asik.

Like you, I admire Morey for his aggressiveness and tact- he's a huge fan of Danny Ainge and they are both guys that don't give an inch. Ainge is looking for as much value as possible too, but he won't be roped into Morey's personal deadline.

Ainge knows what the market for Asik is. There aren't too many players or teams available, so Morey's options are ultimately limited because he also knows that the Rockets don't want to pay Asik 20 million over 2 seasons(or one monster 15 million hit next season more importantly). 

As with most negotiation sessions, the longer the buyer waits, generally the price goes down. The longer the seller waits, more pressure gets put on Morey from the owners to make a move and get rid of this 15 million dollar headache as the deadline approaches.

Ainge ultimately wouldn't give up any more than Bass and Lee. He wouldn't give up Bass and Bogans and it was probably discussed earlier.
I think in your dollars/cents outline you meant Bass+Lee not Bogans/Lee.

The difference between our viewpoint is that I think Bass+Bogans is a far better deal than Bass+Lee because I think the Rockets want to save money and move the headache.
So I'd actually re-work your dollars/cents exchange to having Bass and Lee as a 75c offer and
Bogans/Bass as a 90c to the dollar offer.


I believe Morey would love to clear Asik's 8 million off the cap and 15 million salary for Brandon Bass and an expiring Bogan's contract. What he didn't want was another 2.5 years of Courtney Lee at $5 million.
I think Ainge's number one priority was moving Lee and/or Bass, getting Asik back as a valuable bonus. He wanted to move the Lee contract and get out of that 2.5 years of salary.

Ainge had the Memphis deal in the background as back up, because they've discussed the deal before- but he thought if he could move Lee, and Bass, whilst keep Bogans expiring for another trade or extra chip in another deal, he'd go hard at that option first.

Just because Morey had an imaginary deadline trying to stir up some excitement and urgency doesn't mean anything to Ainge. He knows that Morey is going to be under more pressure in the next 6 weeks- the whole point of Morey signing Asik to this deal was so he could get rid of him before they pay him the 15 million.

If I were Ainge, I'd now include Bogans or Humphries and ask for a nice pick or young, cheap asset in return before finally giving in to just Bass+Bogans. I'd say it's likely Morey doesn't get many more offers and finds that a deal that,
*moves Asik and his 15 million salary
*brings in a 6.5 million dollar veteran big man for the playoffs
*gives him 2 million more in cap room next season whilst eliminating Asik's salary and headache

..is a pretty good deal.
Of course that's if Danny even wants Asik now.

There's no rush though, at least from Danny's point of view.
 ;)
« Last Edit: January 06, 2014, 04:49:52 AM by chambers »
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2014, 04:58:41 AM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
The counterbalance is not Asik's salary! At least I think not.

It's the fact they need to re-up Parsons but have 2 backloaded contracts in Lin and Asik.

Overall Asik's contract was a good one for Houston. I believe the flexibility from Asik's contract alone makes it worth the balloon in salary. 25 mil' over 3 years is fair value. I think.

Hell, only part of Asik's salary counts against the cap...iirc.

Otherwise, I agree with you on the fact that Morey doesn't have all the chips.




It doesn't make a lot of sense to me as to why Morey's insisting on keeping a non-performing contract. This is when you stop worrying about being fleeced. You're contending, Morey!

A "95 cent" offer is about as good as it gets.


Perhaps they're looking to keep Asik and dump Lin? They do need to dump one or the other to keep Parsons, right?

But...for one Asik doesn't look like he'll dress up for the Rockets ever again. With all the space Asik is eating up, they could be getting the help the so desperately need.

And which sucker is going to trade for Lin? The massive contract is somewhat justifiable for Asik...but Lin?


Unless Morey pulls some crazy wizardry, isn't the clock ticking?

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #20 on: January 06, 2014, 05:37:04 AM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
^i don't want Asik anymore, with each mounting loss at almost the halfway point of the season and Lee gone, if we're goin to bottom out let's just bottom out screw it. bogans, bayless and crawford will shoot us into the lottery. >:(
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #21 on: January 06, 2014, 06:07:58 AM »

Offline heitingas

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 740
  • Tommy Points: 57
Danny won't give up a 1st so likely a third team has to be involved

The deal that would work

To Cavs: Green
To Rockets: Varajao
To Celtics: Asik

But Cavs are hesitant to give up Varajao

If we're giving up Green, I'd much rather have Varejao than Asik.

He's better and cheaper than Asik so I have no idea why Rockets should be involved.


Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #22 on: January 06, 2014, 06:24:15 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20130
  • Tommy Points: 1333
I think the other shoe will drop soon....

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #23 on: January 06, 2014, 07:44:27 AM »

Offline TwinTower14

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 48
^i don't want Asik anymore, with each mounting loss at almost the halfway point of the season and Lee gone, if we're goin to bottom out let's just bottom out screw it. bogans, bayless and crawford will shoot us into the lottery. >:(

I agree - I think you will see subtractions going forward.  Bass is definitely going to go, he is a valuable chip on a contending team.  Funny how we were all like when Rondo gets backs we are good, well DA is going to strip away all the good role player...hahaha...

I feel like this season was already a success just from the Brad Steven's perspective, he is clearly an NBA coach, now we just need to get him some talent...whether it's from trades or the lottery...

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #24 on: January 06, 2014, 08:02:28 AM »

Offline 2short

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6080
  • Tommy Points: 428
what about okafor?
trade for him this year, he doesn't affect this season but is still a good defensive rebounding center who with rondo can easily average 10 pts
i'm thinking he can be gotten for quite a bit less?

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #25 on: January 06, 2014, 08:05:13 AM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
^i don't want Asik anymore, with each mounting loss at almost the halfway point of the season and Lee gone, if we're goin to bottom out let's just bottom out screw it. bogans, bayless and crawford will shoot us into the lottery. >:(

You can bottom out with Asik. It's not like he'll drastically improve the team. (especially if we have to give up Green for him too)

The good thing about having Omer Asik is come next year (and hopefully few more) we are set at the the Center position. We will have a great rebounder and rim protector moving forward.

(again, as long as he doesnt quit)
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #26 on: January 06, 2014, 10:24:27 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Given Bogans has been on the team all year and is quite expendable, don't you think this would have already been discussed by Ainge and Morey and soundly rejected?

If all the Rockets wanted was salary relief, I believe Asik would have been gone already.

I think they would have discussed it but I don't think Danny takes on Asik without having Lee gone first. That was the sticking point- Danny didn't want Lee, and neither did Morey.

Understand that the pressure here on is on the Rockets.

Danny knows that Morey is going to move Asik by the February deadline. He's got 6 weeks to trade him or they'll be paying Asik 20 million over 2 years as a chair warmer for Dwight Howard who does not want to play behind Dwight. I think salary relief and not going over the cap are definitely his main objectives.

The longer Ainge waits, the more desperate Morey will become and he'll settle for something like a Bass+Bogans deal for the salary relief. Is anyone giving up a first round pick for this guy? I doubt it.

Danny is in the drivers seat either way you look at it.
My take on the situation is simple:

Morey declined Lee, knowing that Bogans+Bass was an option if they couldn't get a deal done by December 19th.
Danny wasn't prepared to do anything unless Lee was gone whilst putting pressure on Morey to eventually accept his terms.

Judging from business negotiations I have had that's not how it works. That thinking, and please don't take this the wrong way, is too narrow minded for business. A much wider view of the entire situation is usually taken and talked about by both sides. I am 1000% sure Danny wasn't thinking I have to get rid of Lee first and only then will I make a Bogans Bass trade. As I said, that's just not very smart business.

If you have a product and want to sell it for a dollar but decide you can live with selling it for 90 cents and no less, if someone wants to negotiate the price they will come in at 75 cents go to 85 cents and then the real negotiations begin.

Bogans Bass is a 75 cent offer.
Bogans Lee is an 85 cent offer.
Bogans Lee and a pick is probably a 95 cent to one dollar offer.

I am sure both parties discussed what their end game was here and needs. I am sure multiple offers and demands were put on the table in both directions and after several long discussions Morey and Ainge came to their final offers and neither was good enough.

If Bass Lee wasn't good enough in a completely manufactured deadline infused market like Morey created, I am sure a lesser offer isn't going to get the job done now.

Nick I'm not offended at all. I'm actually a negotiator by profession and make (reasonably large) deals for a living...so I understand what you're saying. Now that I've tooted my own horn a bit more...

My analysis of this situation is that Ainge has had the upper hand the whole time. Morey is trying to control what he can and doing a good job of marketing his overpaid goon Asik.

Like you, I admire Morey for his aggressiveness and tact- he's a huge fan of Danny Ainge and they are both guys that don't give an inch. Ainge is looking for as much value as possible too, but he won't be roped into Morey's personal deadline.

Ainge knows what the market for Asik is. There aren't too many players or teams available, so Morey's options are ultimately limited because he also knows that the Rockets don't want to pay Asik 20 million over 2 seasons(or one monster 15 million hit next season more importantly). 

As with most negotiation sessions, the longer the buyer waits, generally the price goes down. The longer the seller waits, more pressure gets put on Morey from the owners to make a move and get rid of this 15 million dollar headache as the deadline approaches.

Ainge ultimately wouldn't give up any more than Bass and Lee. He wouldn't give up Bass and Bogans and it was probably discussed earlier.
I think in your dollars/cents outline you meant Bass+Lee not Bogans/Lee.

The difference between our viewpoint is that I think Bass+Bogans is a far better deal than Bass+Lee because I think the Rockets want to save money and move the headache.
So I'd actually re-work your dollars/cents exchange to having Bass and Lee as a 75c offer and
Bogans/Bass as a 90c to the dollar offer.


I believe Morey would love to clear Asik's 8 million off the cap and 15 million salary for Brandon Bass and an expiring Bogan's contract. What he didn't want was another 2.5 years of Courtney Lee at $5 million.
I think Ainge's number one priority was moving Lee and/or Bass, getting Asik back as a valuable bonus. He wanted to move the Lee contract and get out of that 2.5 years of salary.

Ainge had the Memphis deal in the background as back up, because they've discussed the deal before- but he thought if he could move Lee, and Bass, whilst keep Bogans expiring for another trade or extra chip in another deal, he'd go hard at that option first.

Just because Morey had an imaginary deadline trying to stir up some excitement and urgency doesn't mean anything to Ainge. He knows that Morey is going to be under more pressure in the next 6 weeks- the whole point of Morey signing Asik to this deal was so he could get rid of him before they pay him the 15 million.

If I were Ainge, I'd now include Bogans or Humphries and ask for a nice pick or young, cheap asset in return before finally giving in to just Bass+Bogans. I'd say it's likely Morey doesn't get many more offers and finds that a deal that,
*moves Asik and his 15 million salary
*brings in a 6.5 million dollar veteran big man for the playoffs
*gives him 2 million more in cap room next season whilst eliminating Asik's salary and headache

..is a pretty good deal.
Of course that's if Danny even wants Asik now.

There's no rush though, at least from Danny's point of view.
 ;)
I understand all that but as you said, my friend, you feel Morey is motivated by needing to dump some salary and that Borans Bass is a better deal in that respect.

I don't see it that way. After bring in large ticket players like Howard and Harden in a win right now mode of thinking, I believe Morey is motivated by bringing in the right complimentary players to his squad and a future asset regardless of the salary.

He wasn't keen on Bass and he already knew what he had in Lee from Lee's first stint there. He would have been happy to do the deal but was looking for a pick as well as he views Asik as a starting caliber center that is a defensive anchor, a rare quality to find nowadays in the NBA.

WWhen he moves Asik, and he will, I believe it will be for a starting quality player or a role player and a pick and not necessarily for a salary dump. Remember, in trading Asik is the cap numbers are about the same they are essentially dumping $7 million in salary because of the poison pill provision already in place.

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #27 on: January 06, 2014, 10:30:36 AM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Had a passing thought late last night: I believe that Boston could bring Houston into the Lee-Bayless trade, and send the Rockets Bass and a 1st rounder for Asik. Rockets would not need to take on any additional salary at all (if that was an issue with the earlier proposal).

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ml8jz6m

Celtics still stay below the LT threshold with the expanded deal.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #28 on: January 06, 2014, 11:03:25 AM »

Offline PaulAllen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1103
  • Tommy Points: 55
The Rockets overvalue Asik so an average bench player an a dump contract will never work.. You can give up Green and dump Asik's contract after next season but I dont think that will happen... Danny is doing a nice job and I expect a 2007 esq season of trades to go down next year..

Re: Now that Lee is gone, how bout Bass+Bogans for Asik?
« Reply #29 on: January 06, 2014, 11:10:21 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
The Rockets overvalue Asik so an average bench player an a dump contract will never work.. You can give up Green and dump Asik's contract after next season but I dont think that will happen... Danny is doing a nice job and I expect a 2007 esq season of trades to go down next year..
That, or you undervalue Asik. He's certainly worth more than an average bench player and a contract dump.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."