i would have preferred ainge to have picked Antetokounmpo in the draft. my preference was strictly based upon "swinging for the fences" in a bad draft. gamble big i thought. ante was a bigger gamble, but with potentially a higher ceiling.
ainge, who has a lot more to say in the celtics than i do, went more conservative. having said that, olly was a good pick i think, not great, but good.
next, since we are comparing olly and ante, let's take a look at their performance so far. i am not saying this wont change in the future, but so far they are not dramatically different.
Antetokounmpo
23 minutes/ game
7.2 pts/game
4.7 rbs/game
1.4 asts/game
54% fg
31% 3 pt
73% ft
OVOO (our very own olly)
19.4 minutes/ game
6.9 pts/game
4.6 rbs/game
1.6 asts/game
41% fg
30% 3 pt
86% ft
biggest differences so far?
(1) ante does better by far on fg%, but then, olly is being asked to stretch the floor and takes more of his shots from further out i believe.
(2) olly is a really good ft shooter, better than ante so far.
upside goes to ante in all likelihood. but so far, both are performing similarly in terms of stats.
what i want to see is how olly develops as the season goes on. so far his defense has swung from adequate to god-awful. and that is my biggest worry about him. but it is less than 1/2 of the way through his rookie season. let's wait and see.