This post is exactly the WRONG way to think about the NBA:
1. We are about the 15th-20th best team in the league, so adding a dominant 2 guard would make all of those other teams title contenders too, so what's the point? Even teams that alreeady have a good 2 guard could make good use of a "dominant" 2 guard.
2. EVERY NBA team is a title contender with THE dominant 2 guard, if you want to put Lebron in that slot. Even Utah would be a threat, and if you think that's a stretch, look back on the Cavs teams Lebron took to Finals and ECF when he was a much more immature player and tell me they are that much better than the Jazz, etc.
3. What really matters is having THAT GUY, not necessarily the position. You could say every team is a dominant PG, center or PF away, as long as the guy is dominant enough.
4. Finally, this totally dismisses Bradley. He's never ever a top 2 player on a title team, but he's a GREAT piece. Plays very hard, A+ defender, knows his role and doesn't need shots, can score, but doesn't need to dominate the ball on his hands to do so.
We can all dream of getting dominant players, but they only come around every so often. In the meantime, you collect assets and guys who can play next to those superstars. Bradley is a perfect fit in that respect.