0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
AB not handling the ball = twice the player PG AB is.
Personally, believe if the celtics are going after him, Rondo will be dealt.
we already have marshon brooks, why would we add another marshon type player? now if you we could swap the two then why not.
Celtics Blog and its forums always find ways to entertain me.This one was a big laugh. Rondo for Austin Rivers. Ha ha ha.
Quote from: ImShakHeIsShaq on December 16, 2013, 10:12:29 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on December 16, 2013, 10:01:25 PMrivers looks like a bit of a bust. I could see Bradley for Rivers... Boston probably wants to avoid paying Bradley. Rivers is young enough that he could still have a career.Lol. Sometimes I just can't. Please help me make it through trade season Lord. Just no. NO.Well I mean at first glance it's a ridiculous trade. Clearly Bradley is vastly superior to Rivers right now. Rivers first 76 games have been nothing short of catastrophic. But Rivers was thought to be one of the best players in his draft class. At one point he was pegged as a "future star". He was a top 10 pick. He's been dreadful...
Quote from: LarBrd33 on December 16, 2013, 10:01:25 PMrivers looks like a bit of a bust. I could see Bradley for Rivers... Boston probably wants to avoid paying Bradley. Rivers is young enough that he could still have a career.Lol. Sometimes I just can't. Please help me make it through trade season Lord. Just no. NO.
rivers looks like a bit of a bust. I could see Bradley for Rivers... Boston probably wants to avoid paying Bradley. Rivers is young enough that he could still have a career.
Quote from: LarBrd33 on December 16, 2013, 10:29:33 PMQuote from: ImShakHeIsShaq on December 16, 2013, 10:12:29 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on December 16, 2013, 10:01:25 PMrivers looks like a bit of a bust. I could see Bradley for Rivers... Boston probably wants to avoid paying Bradley. Rivers is young enough that he could still have a career.Lol. Sometimes I just can't. Please help me make it through trade season Lord. Just no. NO.Well I mean at first glance it's a ridiculous trade. Clearly Bradley is vastly superior to Rivers right now. Rivers first 76 games have been nothing short of catastrophic. But Rivers was thought to be one of the best players in his draft class. At one point he was pegged as a "future star". He was a top 10 pick. He's been dreadful... People should consider this, and the fact that Bradley was a top rated prospect as well, when they're talking about how the 2014 draft class is can't miss because the talent evaluators are so accurate. Now, back to your regularly scheduled thread.
They weren't willing to trade Bradley for Rivers when his potential seemed high during that draft day, why would they trade him for an obvious bust now? And Rivers is absolutely not worth a first round pick. Late round or future. Absolutely not.