« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Denver doesn't need McGee?  (Read 6433 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Denver doesn't need McGee?
« on: December 08, 2013, 11:06:58 PM »

Offline jay

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1359
  • Tommy Points: 51
McGee comes back, acquire him for Bass, Olynyk, brooks, Clippers pick? 
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2013, 11:13:45 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
No.  Guy with the physical ability that never bothered to learn the game.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2013, 11:14:17 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Are you talking about Javale McGee?  He has a stress fracture in his leg and is out indefinitely.  Denver fired George Karl for not playing McGee.  Why would they give up now?
Logged
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2013, 11:19:37 PM »

Offline beklog

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1248
  • Tommy Points: 64
I'll pass with McGee, i think even Fab has a better BBIQ than him, and I don't want McGee to bring out the Wizards out of Crawford
Logged
Amateurs worry about equipment, professionals worry about money, masters worry about light… I just take pictures…
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2013, 12:10:21 AM »

Offline Pucaccia

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 558
  • Tommy Points: 65
And we don't either. With his athletic ability, he should be better than this.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2013, 01:16:23 AM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
Quote from: LooseCannon on December 08, 2013, 11:14:17 PM
Are you talking about Javale McGee?  He has a stress fracture in his leg and is out indefinitely.  Denver fired George Karl for not playing McGee.  Why would they give up now?

Also for not playing Mozgov.

Looking like a pretty dang good plan right now.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2013, 01:22:12 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Quote from: jay on December 08, 2013, 11:06:58 PM
McGee comes back, acquire him for Bass, Olynyk, brooks, Clippers pick?

What the heck?? Terrible idea for one of the dumbest players in the game on a terrible contract.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2013, 01:43:53 AM »

Offline Vox_Populi

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4468
  • Tommy Points: 346
Quote from: beklog on December 08, 2013, 11:19:37 PM
I'll pass with McGee, i think even Fab has a better BBIQ than him, and I don't want McGee to bring out the Wizards out of Crawford
Burn.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2013, 06:54:49 AM »

Offline cltc5

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7176
  • Tommy Points: 463
Quote from: jay on December 08, 2013, 11:06:58 PM
McGee comes back, acquire him for Bass, Olynyk, brooks, Clippers pick?

You know there's non alcoholic egg nog right?
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2013, 06:58:01 AM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Quote from: BudweiserCeltic on December 09, 2013, 01:22:12 AM
Quote from: jay on December 08, 2013, 11:06:58 PM
McGee comes back, acquire him for Bass, Olynyk, brooks, Clippers pick?

What the heck?? Terrible idea for one of the dumbest players in the game on a terrible contract.

True, but then there ARE people on here who want to trade for Asik...so trading for a moron with zero basketball IQ and who constantly features in the spotlight of Shaqtin-a-fool sounds like a pretty good idea by comparison.

At least McGee knows his a moron and won't complain about being on the bench.

Oh, and thanks to his athleticism he actually has SOME upside.

Asik on the other hand is the equivalent of just sticking a big useless rock in the key and saying "sit".
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2013, 07:25:31 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53035
  • Tommy Points: 2574
McGee interested me when we had Garnett here. I thought KG could cover a lot of the holes in his game and be a good mentor to McGee. A risky gamble but worthwhile risk.

Without KG, I don't think Boston has the right environment for McGee to prosper. No longer a worthwhile risk in my view.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2013, 07:47:07 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20131
  • Tommy Points: 1333
Great athlete with size with the basketball IQ of a pea.  No thanks.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2013, 08:28:39 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
Havent you ever seen Shaq'tn a fool? No thanks to McGee, his absurd play, and his absurd contract.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2013, 08:31:33 AM »

Offline celticslove

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1760
  • Tommy Points: 188
If we do get him the only thing that we've gain is more tv time for shaqtin' a fool. So i'll also pass on this one.
Logged
Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2013, 08:38:46 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7680
  • Tommy Points: 447
McGee always puts up good numbers per minute but his team is always better when he is on the bench.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »