Larry Sanders under investigation for starting a bar fight

[hpantazo]

http://www.jrn.com/tmj4/news/i-team/Bucks-star-Larry-Sanders--230896281.html

apparently he started the fight, and smashed a champagne bottle on a guys head. I wonder if this is where he got his thumb injury

[Donoghus]

Probably a simple misunderstanding.

[hpantazo]

Probably a simple misunderstanding.

doesn't sound that way from the report and from the Bucks statement

[Donoghus]

Probably a simple misunderstanding.

doesn't sound that way from the report and from the Bucks statement

Evidently, my facetiousness doesn't transend well through writing. 

[LooseCannon]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

[hpantazo]

Probably a simple misunderstanding.

doesn't sound that way from the report and from the Bucks statement

Evidently, my facetiousness doesn't transend well through writing. 

ahh, ok, my bad. I should have known better considering who the post came from

[Fafnir]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. Its awful tempting but you'd be hitching to a garbage man offensively who only had one elite season defensively.

[kozlodoev]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. Its awful tempting but you'd be hitching to a garbage man offensively who only had one elite season defensively.

Right, and how is what you're giving up any better?

[Endless Paradise]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. Its awful tempting but you'd be hitching to a garbage man offensively who only had one elite season defensively.

Right, and how is what you're giving up any better?

Humphries is at least expiring.  Sanders has a four-year deal that kicks in after this season.

[pearljammer10]

I thought this was quite good...

#Cavs coach Mike Brown on reports that Bucks Larry Sanders out after hurting thumb in alleged bar fight:

"Did he win?"

— M.S. Boyer/J. Valade (@PDcavsinsider) November 6, 2013

[kozlodoev]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. Its awful tempting but you'd be hitching to a garbage man offensively who only had one elite season defensively.

Right, and how is what you're giving up any better?

Humphries is at least expiring.  Sanders has a four-year deal that kicks in after this season.

Right, but you get Sanders because he can play, and to keep him. Humphries, not so much.

Also, Sullinger is appreciably less proven than Sanders.

[hpantazo]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. Its awful tempting but you'd be hitching to a garbage man offensively who only had one elite season defensively.

Right, and how is what you're giving up any better?

Humphries is at least expiring.  Sanders has a four-year deal that kicks in after this season.

Right, but you get Sanders because he can play, and to keep him. Humphries, not so much.

Also, Sullinger is appreciably less proven than Sanders.

I wouldn't trade Sullinger or Olynyk for Sanders, never mind add a 1st rounder too.

[Fafnir]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. Its awful tempting but you'd be hitching to a garbage man offensively who only had one elite season defensively.

Right, and how is what you're giving up any better?

If we're out and out rebuilding the financial commitment it worrying.

I'd also add that the pick is a big question mark, it'd have to be a high value one so one of the C's own picks. That's a scary prospect, losing a lottery pick on a team that is looking to be bad for the foreseeable future is how you stay bad.

[Fafnir]

If they get tired of him, Humphries, a young big, and a first for Sanders?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. Its awful tempting but you'd be hitching to a garbage man offensively who only had one elite season defensively.

Right, and how is what you're giving up any better?

Humphries is at least expiring.  Sanders has a four-year deal that kicks in after this season.

Right, but you get Sanders because he can play, and to keep him. Humphries, not so much.

Also, Sullinger is appreciably less proven than Sanders.

Right and he's paid 1/8th as much and don't forget Sanders has only one season of above average play.

[kozlodoev]

I'd also add that the pick is a big question mark, it'd have to be a high value one so one of the C's own picks. That's a scary prospect, losing a lottery pick on a team that is looking to be bad for the foreseeable future is how you stay bad.

The question isn't whether you're losing a lottery pick, but what is the likelihood of that pick netting us someone better than Sanders.

Sanders was pretty good last year. Possibly as good as your average lottery pick.