0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: IndeedProceed on October 10, 2013, 01:37:20 PMParsons+?+Asik>Turkoglu+Lewis+GortatThat's how I'd look at it. Turkoglu and Lewis and Nelson for that matter owe Dwight Howard a lot of money for making them look competent. No way. You're drastically underrating how good Lewis and Turk were in their prime.
Parsons+?+Asik>Turkoglu+Lewis+GortatThat's how I'd look at it. Turkoglu and Lewis and Nelson for that matter owe Dwight Howard a lot of money for making them look competent.
I disagree with you IP. You're underselling Rashard Lewis and Turk.Asik is a good player, but he plays the same position as Howard. No way can he impact that game as much as Rashard Lewis did because of that. Not to mention for all the laughter his contract got he was a [dang] good player in 08-09. His adjusted +/- was better than Pau Gasols. That's still slightly worse than Asik's this year, but Asik/Howard don't have the same sort of offensive synergy that Lewis/Howard did.
I also think you wildly overrate Parsons, Turk was better than him too. Not as efficient scoring wise, but a much more dangerous threat with the ball. I think Parsons gets too much love for his play on the court because he's paid nearly nothing.