Wait a second. Shouldn't the punishment for doing something like this be having to attend *more* "Rookie Transition" sessions?
It's like dismissing someone from driver's ed because they fail the parallel parking test.
He has to attend again with the 2014 class
Zillgitt noted that Muhammad will be required to return to the rookie symposium next season—as a sophomore—with the Class of 2014 draftees and other players who have yet to attend the program.
Okay, got it. It's more like sending someone home from driver's ed and making him come back in a year - but letting him drive in the meantime.
My guess is a fine will be forthcoming either from the league or the team. While $20-25 large isn't much for someone that just signed a multi-million dollar contract, it will hurt some.
Suppose you offered every rookie the choice to attend, or to just pay the $25k up front and avoid the thing entirely (or even push it back a year). How many would pony up?
I'm being a bit facetious of course, but either the educational value matters or it doesn't. This sends an odd message.
I kind of agree here. What's the point of having this symposium, and having rules, if breaking the rules has very little consequence? Isn't this just teaching these guys, "don't worry, if you break the rules, you'll just pay a small fine, and be done with it"?
Why even bother, it juts seems like a charade, to me. If the NBA truly cared about these kids, they'd have more strict guidelines, and consequences, that needed to be followed, tying them in to one's ability to play in games. Simply deferring attendance to a future season, is pointless, IMHO.