Author Topic: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.  (Read 8944 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.
« Reply #30 on: July 13, 2013, 08:39:57 PM »

Offline goCeltics

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1922
  • Tommy Points: 71
we got too many 2's and 4's on this roster we need some 1's and 5's, if I was danny i'd been looking to pick up a bad salary that expires next year in order to get a pick or young player inexchange, humphries + brooks should net we us somthing good, especially if we are willing to pick up a bad contract in a deal

I think lee and bass will gain value as the season goes on, and there deals become shorter and teams try to make smaller deals and find role players to fill out there roster
« Last Edit: July 13, 2013, 09:06:56 PM by goCeltics »

Re: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.
« Reply #31 on: July 13, 2013, 08:56:31 PM »

Offline EDWARDO

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 642
  • Tommy Points: 93
Bass to Memphis for Tony Wroten is a good deal

Wait, that about makes sense... would have to be some salaries to match...

Re: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.
« Reply #32 on: July 13, 2013, 11:04:02 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
How about keeping Bass and see how he does under a new coach. The guy is a physical freak.

So you want to keep his 6 million a year for the next three years to play a few minutes a game behind Sully and KO?

It's not yet certain that Olynyk can play NBA-level defense.  It's not certain that Sullinger will be healthy.  It makes sense for the Celtics to have a third-string power forward behind them and I'd rather use Bass than Humphries.

Yikes, so Bass is a starting pf on a contending team, but a third stringer on next year's [supposed] lottery team. I really think we would be doing Bass a favor by shipping him to Hou or Mem rather than him wasting away on our bench. If he is going to stay, he should be getting at least 24 minutes a game - not fair otherwise.

Bass wasn't starting PF on a contending team. He got the job because the players in front of him got injured. So he's really a bench player who landed on the starting spot out of necessity, not based on his skill level.

Jermaine O'neal and then Wilcox were starting prior to Bass getting the chance out of necessity.

What are you talking about? Bass was the 4th leading scorer on the team that year both in the regular season (ahead of Rondo) and in the playoffs (ahead of Allen). He also averaged the 4th most minutes on the team, barely ahead of Garnett (15 more than Wilcox and 9 more than Jermaine). I know that Wilcox and Jermaine's corpse were shoe-ins for the all-star game, but Bass had solidified himself as the 5th 'player' on the team prior to those injuries and deserved to start when he did.

Any team we are discussing trading him to now is a bonafide  playoff team where he would start. Making the guy a third stringer on a crappy team isn't the best use of his talent for us or for the value we could receive. He is a very good basketball player.

I wasn't talking about who's better than who. I'm talking about the role he fits in a roster. His role is a big coming of the bench who can score. That he can play starter, sure. I really have little problem with that, in a vacuum.

But the assertion that Bass was a starting PF in a contender, while true, it's flawed. He really wasn't.

In that year, he was more productive as a bench player. That's his role, it should remain his role. In part, because he's a lousy passer )and a blackhole - No Pass Bass), has butter hands, and is inconsistent defensively.

His asset is the midrange shot, which is perfect for a first big off the bench to give a us a scoring punch.

Re: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.
« Reply #33 on: July 13, 2013, 11:11:40 PM »

Offline EDWARDO

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 642
  • Tommy Points: 93
I think BudweiserCeltic is right here. He's only a "starter" on a title team if you have THREE other great players with him. Its semantics to call him a starter on a title team just because he was out there for us. He's a useful guy on a title team. I think that's very fair to say. If you have a great PG, C and wing player, sure he could start and be a solid contributor, but a there's a lot of guys who could fit that description. Its certainly not him that is pushing it over the top.

Re: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.
« Reply #34 on: July 13, 2013, 11:38:04 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Brandon Bass isn't a horrible player.  He is a useful role player.  There are world champions who have started worse players than Bass.  It'd be hard to have a miserable team with fewer than 30 wins if Brandon Bass is your worst starter (assuming your roster makes sense instead of being horribly constructed).
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.
« Reply #35 on: July 13, 2013, 11:40:24 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Brandon Bass isn't a horrible player.  He is a useful role player.  There are world champions who have started worse players than Bass.  It'd be hard to have a miserable team with fewer than 30 wins if Brandon Bass is your worst starter (assuming your roster makes sense instead of being horribly constructed).

I like Bass, but with Sullinger on the roster, he just doesn't fit.

That said, he was horrible for the first half of the season. He did quite well in the second half, particularly with the roles Doc was forcing him into... playing center!

Re: Favorite Brandon Bass trade.
« Reply #36 on: July 13, 2013, 11:43:49 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11472
  • Tommy Points: 5352
  • Thumper of the BASS!
Bass was great
during the playoffs his scoring, rebounding and defense kept us in the playoffs..why get rid of a player like that?