« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2013, 08:02:11 PM »
Wait, what? Theidea is to fix the "mistake" of Gerald Green's 3.5 million contract by offering them a worse contract of equal length, and asking them to throw in a developing big who is under team control for multiple years for their troubles? And you want to get a pick, too?! That's just _not_ the way trades happen in the NBA.
To put things in perspective, last year Gerald Green gave the Pacers about 75% of Courtney Lee's contribution to the Celtics for 70% of the cost.
It's trading a player they don't like anymore on a contract they don't like who plays the same position as free agent signing Chris Copeland and first round pick Solomon Hill for a player they have liked in the past at a position where they need some depth who is signed to a contract that many think is reasonable.
I'm not sure if the Pacers are willing to give up Plumlee as the price of doing a deal, but I definitely think they would be willing to move their fifth-string small forward for a primary back-up shooting guard.
for some reason, Plumlee strikes me as more of a PF than C. I'd prefer to get a more-legit C prospect. Plumlee just underwhelms me for some reason.
The reason I proposed the idea is precisely because Plumlee is underwhelming. I don't think a more-legit center prospect will be available without giving up a draft pick or similar value, so for a rebuilding team, I'd be looking for a guy who hasn't cracked his team's rotation yet but who isn't a complete lost cause.
I was whelmed by him watching him in Summer league, wouldn't be surprised if he takes a step forward next year.
TP for "whelmed."

Logged
DKC Seventy-Sixers:
PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF: Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF: E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C: N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson