And Seattle has NOT shown itself deserving of an NBA team?



Seattle deserves a team, just not Sacramento's.
Milwaukee. hehehe
to me, i think the answer is Indiana. They've had young, exciting and competitive teams over the last ten years and that city still is just supporting them.
They had strong support until "world peace" went into the stands and hit a fan. After that it took a long time for Bird to get the fans back. And he did that for the most part. If I lived in Indiana it take me a long time to support that team again after what happened.
Just as it will take a long time for the people of Charlotte to come around with their team after what happened to the Hornets.
4. Indiana Pacers
10-year change in attendance: -24.32% (second biggest decline in NBA)
W-L record 10 years: 399-421 (15th worst)
Operating income (2010): -$17 million
Year founded: 1967
Value: $269 million (fourth least valuable in NBA)
The Indiana Pacers have not been in the black since 2005. Including 2010’s $17 million net loss, the team has cumulatively lost $52 million in five years. The team made the playoffs last year, ending a four-year drought, but then lost in five games to the Chicago Bulls. Attendance has declined precipitously since 2001, when the team was two years removed from a six-game loss in the championship to the Los Angeles Lakers. In 2001, the team averaged attendance of 17,888 per home game. In 2009, the team cut ticket prices by 30%, hoping to attract fans, but so far it has had little success. Last year, the Pacers averaged 13,538 people per home game, easily the worst in the league.