Dwight still has the talent and ability to be a franchise star. Not the main scorer, but you could put a guy like Danny Granger was a few seasons ago next to him and they'd be pretty good.
The Lakers are in a much better place than the Celtics because they already have that franchise guy in place. The Celtics are going to spend the next 5-10 years trying to get that franchise guy, while the Lakers can immediately begin the process of finding the right guys to put around Dwight.
The first step for them is definitely trading Pau to clear up some space and get players that fit next to Dwight better.
Yeah, it's a darn shame the Celts don't have a great player who probably won't be their main scorer.
Oh, wait...
Rondo is a very nice player, but in my mind he's a complementary star, not the main piece. I believe Dwight is the kind of player who can be the main piece, if for no other reason than because he's a dominant center in a league without many good centers.
I know we've had this discussion before and you feel differently, so there's not much point in rehashing our positions on it.
I'll just say that I think it's silly when people act like saying that Rondo is not the guy to build your franchise around is the same as saying he's not very good.
Robert Parish and Kevin McHale were great players. James Worthy was a great player. Tony Parker is a very good player. Manu Ginobili was a great player and is still a very good one.
None of the above wins a title without Bird, Magic, Duncan, etc.