People don't get this.
Had Rondo played today... the game would have been different, but not necessarily better.
Our lineup and our playing style would have to be completely adjusted to tailor Rondo's strengths AND weaknesses.
Sure maybe Rondo gets you 11 assists and less turnovers... but would Jeff Green drop an efficient 26 points, 7 boards and 3 blocks?... probably not, since Green needs the ball to be effective and Rondo requires the ball 24/7.
Would we have limited JR Smith as well as we did... would we continue to start Bradley?... would the Knicks take advantage of a size mismatch if Bradley was playing SG? Would we have shot a perfect 19/19 from the line?..
We don't know... We know that we were in the middle of a 6 game losing streak when Rondo went out and played brilliantly once he was gone, we know that we have zero evidence that Green and Rondo can be effective at the same time (Green needs space... and Rondo without the ball doesn't help spread the floor), we don't know yet if Rondo can be effective in a free-flowing ball-sharing offense or if his lack of shooting ability would be a liability.
The game would have been different. The score would have been different. We don't know if we would have won, though.
Anyways... we'll probably sweep the next 4 so I wouldn't stress it.