Author Topic: Losing 5 games in row, shows that KG is the real leader and not Rondo  (Read 9375 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Losing 5 games in row, shows that KG is the real leader and not Rondo
« Reply #60 on: March 28, 2013, 05:46:15 PM »

Offline syfy9

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1873
  • Tommy Points: 291
  • We may as well put Tyrion in at center.
Rondo would have a very difficult time cracking the starting lineup on half the teams in the NBA - and he would be terrible off the bench...

I like Marcus Smart

Re: Losing 5 games in row, shows that KG is the real leader and not Rondo
« Reply #61 on: March 28, 2013, 06:14:57 PM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
There is not enough of a sample size and too many other varialbes to be able to draw a straight line between the available numbers and a conclusion that KG means more to winning or Rondo means more to winning.

But I am surprise though that people could watch this season and still come to the conclusion that Rondo is more important to winning based on on court contribution, than KG.

Really?

You should read more threads here on Rondo Blog.
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Losing 5 games in row, shows that KG is the real leader and not Rondo
« Reply #62 on: March 28, 2013, 06:18:55 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19670
  • Tommy Points: 1622
KG is way more of a leader, the Captain Pierce leads by example...Green is more important...Crawford and Sullinger, too...Rondo would have a very difficult time cracking the starting lineup on half the teams in the NBA - and he would be terrible off the bench...

Wow, to me you lose credibility when you claim that Crawford and Sullinger are more important than Rondo.  Rondo is an all star, and they other guys...well they aren't.

Re: Losing 5 games in row, shows that KG is the real leader and not Rondo
« Reply #63 on: March 28, 2013, 06:22:53 PM »

Offline Lightskinsmurf

  • NCE
  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1949
  • Tommy Points: 134
There is not enough of a sample size and too many other varialbes to be able to draw a straight line between the available numbers and a conclusion that KG means more to winning or Rondo means more to winning.

But I am surprise though that people could watch this season and still come to the conclusion that Rondo is more important to winning based on on court contribution, than KG.

Really?

You should read more threads here on Rondo Blog.

Right lol, I could probably count on one hand the amount of people that think rondo is more important to the team than KG.