As good as Green has been playing lately, I am still not ready to say that the Perk trade was a smart one.
It wasn't even so much that it was a bad trade on paper as much as it was done at the wrong time.
If I remember correctly, that season the Celtics were playing really well and had just gotten Perk back a few weeks prior.
They were a juggernaut in the East and had already beaten Miami 3 times in the regular season.
Regardless of how long Perk was out at that season, it was still the wrong trade at the wrong time.
Having said that, do I think having Perk would've led the Celts to a title that year? Probably not, however that's never a question that a fan or more importantly a GM should ever be asking himself.