Now, perhaps that is what they wanted, for when Durant and Westbrook are on the bench...but I think I would have been more inclined to get a guy who was more of a complimentary catch and shoot guy.
Harden isn't exactly a catch and shoot guy either though.
I thought I read in someone's breakdown of the trade that Martin is a better catch and shooter off the move/screens than Harden is.
I'll have to look for it.
I agree. The benefit of Harden though, is that he was also a bit of a point forward type. He needed the ball in his hands to score on his own, but he was also a decent distributor for a SG.
Ultimately though, I think Harden vs. Martin is not a big deal. If anything is going to stop them from winning a championship, it is going to be the lack of a distributor, and the lack of an interior presence on offense.
And that is where this trade bothers me more than anything. I think they replaced what was a slightly square peg, with a less talented, and sligthly more square peg...although with the other assets they gained, it was a net positive.
I understand this is weird to say about a such a good team, but I feel like they continue to nail the value and talent evaluations, but don't quite get the whole "build a championship TEAM" part of it. I feel like they continue to be less than the sum of the parts, and with an asset like Harden, I think they had an opportunity to try to rectify that a bit, but instead, they chose to just add more parts that don't quite fill the need.