0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: IndeedProceed on October 22, 2012, 12:36:35 AMQuote from: lightspeed5 on October 21, 2012, 10:37:54 PMQuote from: Neurotic Guy on October 21, 2012, 04:43:51 PMA bit much for a few pre-season games -- much of it against non-starters.considering jeff green is a non-starter as well, why is that relevant?It's relevant because of the expectations and history as a player.jeff is coming off our bench to play against bench players for the most part.
Quote from: lightspeed5 on October 21, 2012, 10:37:54 PMQuote from: Neurotic Guy on October 21, 2012, 04:43:51 PMA bit much for a few pre-season games -- much of it against non-starters.considering jeff green is a non-starter as well, why is that relevant?It's relevant because of the expectations and history as a player.
Quote from: Neurotic Guy on October 21, 2012, 04:43:51 PMA bit much for a few pre-season games -- much of it against non-starters.considering jeff green is a non-starter as well, why is that relevant?
A bit much for a few pre-season games -- much of it against non-starters.
Quote from: lightspeed5 on October 22, 2012, 01:23:46 AMQuote from: IndeedProceed on October 22, 2012, 12:36:35 AMQuote from: lightspeed5 on October 21, 2012, 10:37:54 PMQuote from: Neurotic Guy on October 21, 2012, 04:43:51 PMA bit much for a few pre-season games -- much of it against non-starters.considering jeff green is a non-starter as well, why is that relevant?It's relevant because of the expectations and history as a player.jeff is coming off our bench to play against bench players for the most part.By your logic, we can't talk about James Harden in the same sentence as starting players, because he is coming off the bench, too.
He has been outstanding but my guess is as soon as the regular season starts we will see him take a step back and be in an early season "slump" although I sure hope not!
Quote from: RyNye on October 22, 2012, 11:38:14 AMQuote from: lightspeed5 on October 22, 2012, 01:23:46 AMQuote from: IndeedProceed on October 22, 2012, 12:36:35 AMQuote from: lightspeed5 on October 21, 2012, 10:37:54 PMQuote from: Neurotic Guy on October 21, 2012, 04:43:51 PMA bit much for a few pre-season games -- much of it against non-starters.considering jeff green is a non-starter as well, why is that relevant?It's relevant because of the expectations and history as a player.jeff is coming off our bench to play against bench players for the most part.By your logic, we can't talk about James Harden in the same sentence as starting players, because he is coming off the bench, too.Manu Ginobli, Jason Terry, Thad Young...If you're playing 28 minutes + a night, you're playing more than scrubs. And we paid Jeff Green to play more than scrubs.
our bench scoring might be a problem if it is just Lee, Terry, Milicic, and Wilcox
Quote from: manl_lui on October 22, 2012, 11:46:13 AMour bench scoring might be a problem if it is just Lee, Terry, Milicic, and WilcoxLeandro Barbosa and Jared Sullinger wanted to stop by and say hello.
Quote from: kozlodoev on October 22, 2012, 01:45:29 PMQuote from: manl_lui on October 22, 2012, 11:46:13 AMour bench scoring might be a problem if it is just Lee, Terry, Milicic, and WilcoxLeandro Barbosa and Jared Sullinger wanted to stop by and say hello.Milicic not scoring is not a problem since he's not expected to. I know you were just adding him since he's part of the rotation. Barbosa and Sulli on the other hand.........with Lee, JET & Wilcox...someone's bound to be hot vs second stringers.
Quote from: LEHGOCELTICS on October 20, 2012, 11:58:01 PMQuoteJeff Green reality check: 17.7/5.9/1.3 per 40, 44.4% FG in 5 games vs. NBA teams this preseason. In 2010-11? 16.4/5.9/1.8, 44.9%. - John Hollinger on TwitterWhat the hell is this guy's deal with Jeff Green? Does he have a problem with Green performing well or something? He thinks he's a hot shot just because he can run some numbers through a machine. What a shame.Hollinger is a guy who believes deeply in his PER stats, and Jeff Green never really put up the PER to warrant the type of money he got this year. As most people have noted, PER does very little to account for defensive contributions, which is really where Green will be big help.
QuoteJeff Green reality check: 17.7/5.9/1.3 per 40, 44.4% FG in 5 games vs. NBA teams this preseason. In 2010-11? 16.4/5.9/1.8, 44.9%. - John Hollinger on TwitterWhat the hell is this guy's deal with Jeff Green? Does he have a problem with Green performing well or something? He thinks he's a hot shot just because he can run some numbers through a machine. What a shame.
Jeff Green reality check: 17.7/5.9/1.3 per 40, 44.4% FG in 5 games vs. NBA teams this preseason. In 2010-11? 16.4/5.9/1.8, 44.9%.
Quote from: mctyson on October 22, 2012, 10:50:24 AMQuote from: LEHGOCELTICS on October 20, 2012, 11:58:01 PMQuoteJeff Green reality check: 17.7/5.9/1.3 per 40, 44.4% FG in 5 games vs. NBA teams this preseason. In 2010-11? 16.4/5.9/1.8, 44.9%. - John Hollinger on TwitterWhat the hell is this guy's deal with Jeff Green? Does he have a problem with Green performing well or something? He thinks he's a hot shot just because he can run some numbers through a machine. What a shame.Hollinger is a guy who believes deeply in his PER stats, and Jeff Green never really put up the PER to warrant the type of money he got this year. As most people have noted, PER does very little to account for defensive contributions, which is really where Green will be big help.I actually think the Twitter post was something needed around here. Most of this board is all over Green as the greatest bench player ever, etc. yet when you actually take a step back you realize he is putting up virtually the same numbers he did his last full season when most of this board called him a giant disappointment.
Quote from: Moranis on October 23, 2012, 06:34:39 AMQuote from: mctyson on October 22, 2012, 10:50:24 AMQuote from: LEHGOCELTICS on October 20, 2012, 11:58:01 PMQuoteJeff Green reality check: 17.7/5.9/1.3 per 40, 44.4% FG in 5 games vs. NBA teams this preseason. In 2010-11? 16.4/5.9/1.8, 44.9%. - John Hollinger on TwitterWhat the hell is this guy's deal with Jeff Green? Does he have a problem with Green performing well or something? He thinks he's a hot shot just because he can run some numbers through a machine. What a shame.Hollinger is a guy who believes deeply in his PER stats, and Jeff Green never really put up the PER to warrant the type of money he got this year. As most people have noted, PER does very little to account for defensive contributions, which is really where Green will be big help.I actually think the Twitter post was something needed around here. Most of this board is all over Green as the greatest bench player ever, etc. yet when you actually take a step back you realize he is putting up virtually the same numbers he did his last full season when most of this board called him a giant disappointment. Only someone with an agenda can claim that Jeff Green's first (partial) season with us was anything similar to what we see right now. He shot less than .300 from the three, and fouled at a career-high rate (4 per 36 mins).