http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnIifSra3GA
Feel free to change your mind...
I only watched the first minute, but those moves were unbelievably boring and unimpressive compared to those of Hakeem. His quickness and foot work for a 7 footer hasn't been seen since. Maybe you need to watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7tPZ-KljR0
well, i watched more than the first minute of each video and they showed me what i have seen many times about both players.
each are terrific and to denigrate one so as to elevate the other is plain silly.
advocating for a great player is not an automatic zero-sum situation. hakeen was clearly more athletic than mchale, i cant think of anyone who argues otherwise. but saying mchale had "unimpressive" moves under the basket is both inaccurate and unnecessary.
but the point being put forth by the first poster about mchale, i think, is that DOWN LOW, NEAR THE BASKET mchale has more moves and was better than hakeem. watching all of both videos shows that.
look at the majority of hakeem's shots. he was much better farther away from the basket than mchale and that was hakeem's game. no center could guard him there. he was terrific.
look at the majority of mchale's shots. he is consistently double teamed down low and splits/beats the double team so many different ways. he was impossible to stop close to the basket and was stronger battling there than hakeen.
each was great, but had a different type of game. what's the real debate here?