He has looked a lot better than Moore who simply doesn't have the handle to be a point guard.
For a "chucker" Gibson played some good d on Marshon Brooks and made a huge steal and caused a turnover with his pressure at the end of the game to put it away. If Rondo gets hurt we are going to need a guy who can handle the point for half a game or so and Moore simply can't.
Moore is 3 inches taller (probably more like 4) than Gibson. Gibson is the class SG in a PG body. These guys do not have much success in the NBA outside of the Eddie House role.
My guess is he goes back to Turkey, probably makes more money there than in the D-league.
The thing though is they want Moore to be a PG and he struggles against the press. Gibson has a better dribble and much better speed allowing him to get the ball up court. He doesn't have to be a play maker, he just has to get the team into their offense.
If he thinks he can get a call up he'll play in the D-League over Turkey. If he plays in the D-League then you can assume he's hearing positive things from teams.
Also, if he's a chucker then what's Moore? They both averaged pretty similar numbers in college. Their FG% was about the same in college. Gibson was a tad lower by .3% but that's due to a rookie season where he averaged only 7 minutes per game and had an awful percentage.
He had a bad showing in game 1 but if he was given more minutes he would be clearly ahead of Moore. Guess we'll see what he does today but regardless I like him.