We don't have the ammo. Bradley is a nice piece but he's not as valuable as a promising young big the way Al Jefferson was.
No way in hell I'd give up one of our most promising young players (and one of the best perimeter defenders in the league) for a older guy who has a couple of years left in the tank.
The thing I love about what Ainge has done so far is that he's building the perfect ballance between young talent (Rondo, Bradley, Green, Bass, Melo, Sullinger) and proven veterans (KG, Pierce, Terry). This approach allows us the opportunity to compete for a title right now, without really sacrificing our relevance in the future.
I don't mind getting an older big man
as long as they 1. Fill a clear need, and
2. Don't require us to give up key pieces of our future
For example if we could get Marcus Camby (who solves our size, rebounding and interior defense problems) in return for any combinatin of Dooling/Moore/Williams/Joseph/Johnson/picks I'll take it. I don't see any of those guys as critical pieces nor or in the future, so I'm not afraid to give them up if it increases our chance to win right now.
However Rondo, Bradley, Green, Sullinger, Melo and KG are all guys that are off limits to me. The first 5 because they are (IMHO) our future, the last one because he is our present.
Pierce and Terry are guys I
could give up if it's for the right piece, but it would have to be
one hell of a piece. I believe that with all of this youth, we really need at least 2 or 3 veteran guys who are proven performers on the big stage (Playoffs) and Pierce, Terry and KG give us that.
Bass is another one in the
could trade, but I'd rather not category. He's a relatively one dimensional player but he's also young, tough, athletic and more importantly efficient - he had one of the lowest tunover ratios in the league last season. Still, if I get a chance for someone like Josh Smith in return, he's gone.