Rondo was hardly the dominant problem faced by the Celtics last night.
Yet, it is simply beyond discussion that he takes games, plays and sequences off with growing frequency - the definition of uneven play.
And trying to measure uneven play with statistics fails in total to take into account the impact of that uneven play on the other four people on the floor, and is - as usual - a stilted attempt to defend Rondo.
Numbers don't measure effort. Ever. He's been accurately characterized earler in this thread - a good player who can be great ... when he wants to be.
And yes, the humor of "Rondo Infallibility" lives on on Celtics Blog. Kudos to the moderators for some even-handed analysis of the subject out front, but some of you are never going to admit that Rondo isn't the best point guard in the history of the game.
Strawmen, strawmen, strawmen. Nobody--not even me or BBalTim--has ever claimed that Rondo is infallible. I've never used that term.
When people make wildly inaccurate claims whose inaccuracy can easily be disproven, I am willing to point it out, however. It's as simple as that.
I obviously appreciate Rondo as a player more than many of the posters on CelticsBlog. That's cool. Not everybody is going to see things the same way or agree on everything.
When some of us make arguments to dispute some of the crazy stuff that gets written about our players on here, the main counter argument seems to be that we are just blind worshippers and "fan boys." Fine, make that claim. But, back up your opinions with something a little more meaty, please. For goodness' sake.
Talk about lazy. Come on, Coach, you can do better.