Author Topic: Drafting for go-to scoring potential  (Read 12723 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« on: May 11, 2012, 02:18:03 PM »

Offline arambone

  • NCE
  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 828
  • Tommy Points: 80
This list is about potential, as I see it, not about immediate impact. Pierce is a competent primary scoring option for another year or two.

1 Quincy Miller - Total mismatch at the 3, at 6'9"-6'10" with huge wingspan and silky smooth handle and shot. Arguably has as much offensive upside as Paul Pierce, who could groom Miller for a year or two. Knee still healing, Miller's freshman year was also affected by playing with PJ3, which limited his shots and minutes. Food for thought - Kevin Durant was the only go-to scorer as a freshman at Texas, and he also wasn't playing with a recovering ACL.
Potential - #1 scoring option
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhnOApGV3QM

2 Terrence Ross - Athletic, lights out scorer. This was Ross' first year with major minutes, so plenty of room for improvement. Expect his handle to improve this summer, making him extremely well rounded as a go-to scorer.
Potential - #1 or #2 scoring option
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZEiz90oLB4

3 Andrew Nicholson - highly polished post scorer despite limited basketball experience. Emerging outside shooter, shot 43% from 3, including 19-25 in his last 10 games, tournaments included.
This season was the first in which Nicholson shot the 3 regularly. It is a brand new, exciting facet of his game. It's highly probable that Nicholson will become a good ball handler for a PF, and with a couple years in the league, he could become one of the better inside-outside scorers at the PF position.
Potential - #1 or #2 scorer. Al Jefferson with more range, athleticism, and driving ability.
(This mix is from last season, before Nicholson added 15 pounds and a deadly 3 point shot)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L66QmiB0xj4

Dion Waiters, Tony Wroten, Evan Fournier, Moe Harkless, Doron Lamb, and Royce White project as possible #2 scorers, and I'd rank them in that order, scoring-wise.

Jeff Taylor and Marquis Teague project as rock solid #3 scoring options. I think Jenkins will be too slow to get his shot off consistently and be a #3 scoring option.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2012, 02:50:04 PM by arambone »

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2012, 07:47:40 AM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4964
  • Tommy Points: 433
I really like all 3 players you highlighted as potential #1 offensive options and would be thrilled for the Cs to end up with Miller, Ross, or Nicholson. However Ross is the only one who I could see being a go to scoring #1 option.

Miller doesn't appear to me to have a skill set that is going to translate to anything more then a high end complimentary offensive player in the NBA. Where I think his explosiveness will get better as his knee fully recovers from his injury, I can't see him being strong enough or explosive enough to be a consistent offensive threat. His lack of strength will allow defenders to force him into poor shots. Durant is not the norm, most big time scorers are strong physical players. Durant's undefendable 3pt/long 2s are what make him unstoppable, I don't think Miller will ever develop a consistent enough outside shot.

Quincy Miller will be a better ball handling but less athletic Darius Miles. At his best I could see him growing into a 14-16pt 5-6 rb a game guy.

Terrance Ross has the making of a big time NBA scorer. I would not be shocked if he develops very quickly into a 20pt a game scorer. He has great size at the 2, especially with the shift in the NBA to under 6'5 2-guards. That size coupled with above average athleticism and obvious scoring instincts in college should make Ross a very dangerous NBA scorer.

Nichlson I also really like. Alot about him will depend on his size. He reportedly has a very long wingspan 7'3+. If this is true and he measures 6'8+ in shoes then he could be a nice 3rd option in the NBA. I could picture him as a Bass type jump shooting bigman capable of averaging 10-12pts in a season, if he can manage to add bulk and get stronger then he could be the steal of this draft late in the 1st.

 
« Last Edit: May 14, 2012, 08:00:44 AM by CFAN38 »
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2012, 09:25:29 AM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
I really like all 3 players you highlighted as potential #1 offensive options and would be thrilled for the Cs to end up with Miller, Ross, or Nicholson. However Ross is the only one who I could see being a go to scoring #1 option.

Miller doesn't appear to me to have a skill set that is going to translate to anything more then a high end complimentary offensive player in the NBA. Where I think his explosiveness will get better as his knee fully recovers from his injury, I can't see him being strong enough or explosive enough to be a consistent offensive threat. His lack of strength will allow defenders to force him into poor shots. Durant is not the norm, most big time scorers are strong physical players. Durant's undefendable 3pt/long 2s are what make him unstoppable, I don't think Miller will ever develop a consistent enough outside shot.

Quincy Miller will be a better ball handling but less athletic Darius Miles. At his best I could see him growing into a 14-16pt 5-6 rb a game guy.

Terrance Ross has the making of a big time NBA scorer. I would not be shocked if he develops very quickly into a 20pt a game scorer. He has great size at the 2, especially with the shift in the NBA to under 6'5 2-guards. That size coupled with above average athleticism and obvious scoring instincts in college should make Ross a very dangerous NBA scorer.

Nichlson I also really like. Alot about him will depend on his size. He reportedly has a very long wingspan 7'3+. If this is true and he measures 6'8+ in shoes then he could be a nice 3rd option in the NBA. I could picture him as a Bass type jump shooting bigman capable of averaging 10-12pts in a season, if he can manage to add bulk and get stronger then he could be the steal of this draft late in the 1st.

 

I don't know, after 3J I don't see Danny going for a scoring 4 (Nicholson) who may be too scrawny to the defend the position.

I also like Miller's ball handling at age 19 for #1 scoring potential over Ross's being a little stronger when he's almost two years older than Miller.  (Ross was still in high school when he was Miller's age.)

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2012, 10:56:25 AM »

Offline libermaniac

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2941
  • Tommy Points: 385
Great post arambone.  From what I saw, I'm most intrigued with Nicholson.  I like the comparison to Big Al with more range.  I got bored watching Terrence Ross dunk and shoot 3's.  Not saying he can't because I stopped watching, but can he do anything else?  And, Miller is intriguing but looked a step slow for the NBA.  Good stuff!  TP.

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2012, 12:21:32 PM »

Offline arambone

  • NCE
  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 828
  • Tommy Points: 80
Thanks for the responses guys.

I have some thoughts in reply. I've now watched about 5 Baylor games on espn3, focusing on Miller. That knee was definitely a serious problem all year, both physically and mentally.

NBA Execs Question Quincy Miller's Knee Strength After ACL Injury

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/220819/NBA_Execs_Question_Quincy_Millers_Knee_Strength_After_ACL_Injury#ixzz1urAy5s85
Quote
“He needs to spend these couple of months actually working out and rehabbing, and he never did it,” said a Central exec. "He clearly never rehabbed. The atrophy in his leg was incredible. If he gets his leg strength back, he's Durant-like in his ability to get a shot off. He's 6-10 and he can snap his shot off with no trouble."

"The knee thing, that's a tougher read," a Pacific executive said. "How and where does that end up? Is he still getting better? Is he leveling off? He's a really skilled, talented guy, but the knee makes it a little bit of an enigma."

Miller struggled to maintain a high level of consistency.

"He was really up and down this year," one college scout said. "You look at his game logs, they were all over the place. He's a future pick. He may end up being picked by a pretty good team and they might get something down the road. But he could be picked in the Lottery because somebody decides they'd rather gamble on something like that than take a guy who's more polished and is closer to his ceiling."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/220819/NBA_Execs_Question_Quincy_Millers_Knee_Strength_After_ACL_Injury#ixzz1urBHxPbL


Let's hope his knee looks stronger in the medical exams at the Combine in early June.

In addition to the knee issue, I think Q Miller performs best when he is the go-to option, which he was not with PJ3 and a chucking point guard. Miller was the alpha dog the first 5 games of the season, and averaged 17-18 points a game.

Quote
And there seems to be a little Charles Barkley in him when he leaves the court.

Just ask him about how he needed to accept a role with the U-18s.

"At first I came in, I was thinking like I was going to be, you know, the man? But then I had to change that and had to be a role player. And once I got that, I kind of like took over the team. I was second-leading scorer, and best rebounder, and my plus-minus on the court was better than anybody's."

Miller said B.J. Johnson of USA Basketball sat with him and reminded him that every player on the team �-- �Kyrie Irving, Austin Rivers �-- �was a McDonald's All-American type, a potential one-and-done.

"So I just got it in my own head that I was going to have to play a spot. I wasn't going to be a star," Miller said. "That's what I did, but I came out and become a star."

Read more: http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2010-07-23/prep-star-quincy-miller-wants-be-somebody-everybody-hates#ixzz1urCeAmwn

Please note that the overly brash attitude was pre-ACL injury. It's interesting that he seems to have been alpha dog on a team with Rivers and especially Kyrie Irving. Miller was at least a year younger than them too.

I'd love to watch that U-18 team play, but those games are not on espn3.

Aside from Miller's first 5 games as go-to scorer, his only other stand-out scoring games were when he got hot early. Miller played without much confidence or aggressiveness in general, but when he hit his first shot, his confidence skyrocketed and he became a fearless and excellent scorer.

Miller's limpy, gimpy knee made him close to worthless as a defender, and limited his minutes. He didn't get to play for long stretches very often, which isn't good for his style of play.

Cfan38 - Miller shot 35% from 3 on a bad knee, and 81% from the  line. He probably won't ever be as good as Durant from 3, but it is a definite strength of his game. He's got a quick, high release, even though he doesn't really jump on his jumpers, but Miller is very good at manipulating defenders with his ball handling to set up his jumper. At 6'9"-6'10" with a huge wingspan, there are few if any small forwards in the league who will be able to contest his jumper off the dribble.

Assuming Miller's knee gets much stronger, I see his success depending on the same factors as Austin Rivers future success. Both guys need to be a focus of the offense, with regular isolation plays and pick-and-rolls. Pierce gets his share of green lights to isolate, and Miller and Rivers will need the same.

Miller is also a really steady catch and shoot threat, and given his great height and length, that is no small thing.

Assuming Miller's knee checks out, the biggest concern I have with him is possible diva tendencies. He was basically arrogant before his ACL, and while Miller said the injury was very humbling and the best thing to happen to him, that brash star mentality may still be a part of him. He's definitely a really big Twitter guy, and I'm still researching how good a teammate he was at Baylor.

Austin Rivers has the same type of super-confident attitude, and while it helps them both as go-to scorers, it's something to research before spending a first rounder on Miller.

Aside from the knee injury, I'd say the Rondo-Miller relationship would be the next most important thing to figure out/project.

Miller has decently broad shoulders, so he'll probably end up close to Durant's weight in a few years. He might not be fast enough to fly to the rim off the dribble, but he'll be able to pull up for floaters or find the open man, being a good passer and a smart kid in general.

I could see Miller going to a bad team and being the man while losing a lot of games, but I could also see Rondo making this kid pretty spectacular.


As far as Nicholson, he's already got about 15-20 pounds on JJJ, so he should be able to throw his weight around much better. Last night for the 3rd time I watched the only Bonnies game on Espn3. It's against Illinois and Myers Leonard, and Nicholson pretty much shut Leonard down with very smart position defense. He also scored 17 points on Leonard, for whatever that is worth.

I think Nicholson will be a better version of Bass when all is said and done, and able to play some spot minutes at center as well.

I'd like to add Myers Leonard to the list of potential go-to scorers who might be available at 21 - not as a center but as a stretch 4. Leonard is basically a shooting guard who grew an extra 6 inches. I don't see him ever developing a tough interior mentality, but I think he's definitely athletic enough to defend most 4s in the NBA. Playing Leonard at 4 might seem a waste of his size, but Leonard might not ever make it as an above average center anyway. He's got a very nice mid-range stroke, and if he can develop some handles over the years he could be quite the inside/outside threat. Like a bigger PJ3 without the nice handles. Leonard and PJ3 both seem to lack a natural feel for the game, but the scoring potential is there for both of them.

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2012, 12:22:31 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
I don't think Ross will make it that far past the lottery. He's prototypical shooting guard with all the tools to excel in the nba. He's a low risk/high reward  player, IMO. At worst he's JR Smith with a brain.

If Quincy Miller is there when we pick I think we've got to take him. He has lottery pick potential, however I worry about his ability to defend in the NBA. He has average lateral quickness is rail thin.

Nicholson I've never seen play, but from those highlights and his numbers I don't see why he's projected so late. He seems to be an excellent scorer, who defends and rebounds. If size is the only question about him, I'd have no problems grabbing him.


Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2012, 12:28:29 PM »

Online snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
  • Tommy Points: 458
Only caught one Baylor game.  Wasn't impressed with Miller - his handle looked shaky and his shot wasn't falling.  Wasn't very athletic.
2016 CelticsBlog Draft: Chicago Bulls

Head Coach: Fred Hoiberg

Starters: Rubio, Danny Green, Durant, Markieff Morris, Capela
Bench: Sessions, Shumpert, G. Green, T. Booker, Frye
Deep Bench: CJ Watson, H. Thompson, P. Zipser, Papagiannis, Mejri

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2012, 12:37:20 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
Thanks for the responses guys.

I have some thoughts in reply. I've now watched about 5 Baylor games on espn3, focusing on Miller. That knee was definitely a serious problem all year, both physically and mentally.

NBA Execs Question Quincy Miller's Knee Strength After ACL Injury

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/220819/NBA_Execs_Question_Quincy_Millers_Knee_Strength_After_ACL_Injury#ixzz1urAy5s85
Quote
“He needs to spend these couple of months actually working out and rehabbing, and he never did it,” said a Central exec. "He clearly never rehabbed. The atrophy in his leg was incredible. If he gets his leg strength back, he's Durant-like in his ability to get a shot off. He's 6-10 and he can snap his shot off with no trouble."

"The knee thing, that's a tougher read," a Pacific executive said. "How and where does that end up? Is he still getting better? Is he leveling off? He's a really skilled, talented guy, but the knee makes it a little bit of an enigma."

Miller struggled to maintain a high level of consistency.

"He was really up and down this year," one college scout said. "You look at his game logs, they were all over the place. He's a future pick. He may end up being picked by a pretty good team and they might get something down the road. But he could be picked in the Lottery because somebody decides they'd rather gamble on something like that than take a guy who's more polished and is closer to his ceiling."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/220819/NBA_Execs_Question_Quincy_Millers_Knee_Strength_After_ACL_Injury#ixzz1urBHxPbL


Let's hope his knee looks stronger in the medical exams at the Combine in early June.

In addition to the knee issue, I think Q Miller performs best when he is the go-to option, which he was not with PJ3 and a chucking point guard. Miller was the alpha dog the first 5 games of the season, and averaged 17-18 points a game.

Quote
And there seems to be a little Charles Barkley in him when he leaves the court.

Just ask him about how he needed to accept a role with the U-18s.

"At first I came in, I was thinking like I was going to be, you know, the man? But then I had to change that and had to be a role player. And once I got that, I kind of like took over the team. I was second-leading scorer, and best rebounder, and my plus-minus on the court was better than anybody's."

Miller said B.J. Johnson of USA Basketball sat with him and reminded him that every player on the team �-- �Kyrie Irving, Austin Rivers �-- �was a McDonald's All-American type, a potential one-and-done.

"So I just got it in my own head that I was going to have to play a spot. I wasn't going to be a star," Miller said. "That's what I did, but I came out and become a star."

Read more: http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2010-07-23/prep-star-quincy-miller-wants-be-somebody-everybody-hates#ixzz1urCeAmwn

Please note that the overly brash attitude was pre-ACL injury. It's interesting that he seems to have been alpha dog on a team with Rivers and especially Kyrie Irving. Miller was at least a year younger than them too.

I'd love to watch that U-18 team play, but those games are not on espn3.

Aside from Miller's first 5 games as go-to scorer, his only other stand-out scoring games were when he got hot early. Miller played without much confidence or aggressiveness in general, but when he hit his first shot, his confidence skyrocketed and he became a fearless and excellent scorer.

Miller's limpy, gimpy knee made him close to worthless as a defender, and limited his minutes. He didn't get to play for long stretches very often, which isn't good for his style of play.

Cfan38 - Miller shot 35% from 3 on a bad knee, and 81% from the  line. He probably won't ever be as good as Durant from 3, but it is a definite strength of his game. He's got a quick, high release, even though he doesn't really jump on his jumpers, but Miller is very good at manipulating defenders with his ball handling to set up his jumper. At 6'9"-6'10" with a huge wingspan, there are few if any small forwards in the league who will be able to contest his jumper off the dribble.

Assuming Miller's knee gets much stronger, I see his success depending on the same factors as Austin Rivers future success. Both guys need to be a focus of the offense, with regular isolation plays and pick-and-rolls. Pierce gets his share of green lights to isolate, and Miller and Rivers will need the same.

Miller is also a really steady catch and shoot threat, and given his great height and length, that is no small thing.

Assuming Miller's knee checks out, the biggest concern I have with him is possible diva tendencies. He was basically arrogant before his ACL, and while Miller said the injury was very humbling and the best thing to happen to him, that brash star mentality may still be a part of him. He's definitely a really big Twitter guy, and I'm still researching how good a teammate he was at Baylor.

Austin Rivers has the same type of super-confident attitude, and while it helps them both as go-to scorers, it's something to research before spending a first rounder on Miller.

Aside from the knee injury, I'd say the Rondo-Miller relationship would be the next most important thing to figure out/project.

Miller has decently broad shoulders, so he'll probably end up close to Durant's weight in a few years. He might not be fast enough to fly to the rim off the dribble, but he'll be able to pull up for floaters or find the open man, being a good passer and a smart kid in general.

I could see Miller going to a bad team and being the man while losing a lot of games, but I could also see Rondo making this kid pretty spectacular.


As far as Nicholson, he's already got about 15-20 pounds on JJJ, so he should be able to throw his weight around much better. Last night for the 3rd time I watched the only Bonnies game on Espn3. It's against Illinois and Myers Leonard, and Nicholson pretty much shut Leonard down with very smart position defense. He also scored 17 points on Leonard, for whatever that is worth.

I think Nicholson will be a better version of Bass when all is said and done, and able to play some spot minutes at center as well.

I'd like to add Myers Leonard to the list of potential go-to scorers who might be available at 21 - not as a center but as a stretch 4. Leonard is basically a shooting guard who grew an extra 6 inches. I don't see him ever developing a tough interior mentality, but I think he's definitely athletic enough to defend most 4s in the NBA. Playing Leonard at 4 might seem a waste of his size, but Leonard might not ever make it as an above average center anyway. He's got a very nice mid-range stroke, and if he can develop some handles over the years he could be quite the inside/outside threat. Like a bigger PJ3 without the nice handles. Leonard and PJ3 both seem to lack a natural feel for the game, but the scoring potential is there for both of them.


Wonder if Doc and Danny have pumped Austin for scouting info on Miller--Austin might feel a little conflicted about that!

And I'd love to see them land Leonard.  Wouldn't even mind if they moved up for him (or Moultrie).

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2012, 01:16:17 PM »

Offline Potapenko Boxout

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 370
  • Tommy Points: 40
I think Terrence Jones is going to be a serious player in the NBA. I would look into trading up for him, even if we have to trade our 1st and 2nd to move up 3 or 4 spots to even have a shot.

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2012, 01:21:42 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18183
  • Tommy Points: 2747
  • bammokja
I really like all 3 players you highlighted as potential #1 offensive options and would be thrilled for the Cs to end up with Miller, Ross, or Nicholson. However Ross is the only one who I could see being a go to scoring #1 option.

Miller doesn't appear to me to have a skill set that is going to translate to anything more then a high end complimentary offensive player in the NBA. Where I think his explosiveness will get better as his knee fully recovers from his injury, I can't see him being strong enough or explosive enough to be a consistent offensive threat. His lack of strength will allow defenders to force him into poor shots. Durant is not the norm, most big time scorers are strong physical players. Durant's undefendable 3pt/long 2s are what make him unstoppable, I don't think Miller will ever develop a consistent enough outside shot.

Quincy Miller will be a better ball handling but less athletic Darius Miles. At his best I could see him growing into a 14-16pt 5-6 rb a game guy.

Terrance Ross has the making of a big time NBA scorer. I would not be shocked if he develops very quickly into a 20pt a game scorer. He has great size at the 2, especially with the shift in the NBA to under 6'5 2-guards. That size coupled with above average athleticism and obvious scoring instincts in college should make Ross a very dangerous NBA scorer.

Nichlson I also really like. Alot about him will depend on his size. He reportedly has a very long wingspan 7'3+. If this is true and he measures 6'8+ in shoes then he could be a nice 3rd option in the NBA. I could picture him as a Bass type jump shooting bigman capable of averaging 10-12pts in a season, if he can manage to add bulk and get stronger then he could be the steal of this draft late in the 1st.

 

I don't know, after 3J I don't see Danny going for a scoring 4 (Nicholson) who may be too scrawny to the defend the position.

I also like Miller's ball handling at age 19 for #1 scoring potential over Ross's being a little stronger when he's almost two years older than Miller.  (Ross was still in high school when he was Miller's age.)

ainge will be taking quite a few factors into consideration, but honestly i dont think he would pass on nicholson because of 3j. 3j has looked talented on offense, but a bit lost on defense.

from the videos, nicholson is much more likely to be able to play nearer the basket and seems more of a powerforward with range. 3j seems much more like a tall sf to me.

i dont see them as redundant. and if both turn out well, then so much the better.

ainge should, and will, go for the best player available. if it is nicholson, great. if not, i trust ainge to come away with a talented player or 3 in this draft.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2012, 01:32:43 PM »

Offline OsirusCeltics

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2013
  • Tommy Points: 198
I'm still mad that the Celtics missed out on drafting on Marshon Brooks

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2012, 01:48:49 PM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4964
  • Tommy Points: 433
Quote
ainge will be taking quite a few factors into consideration, but honestly i dont think he would pass on nicholson because of 3j. 3j has looked talented on offense, but a bit lost on defense.

from the videos, nicholson is much more likely to be able to play nearer the basket and seems more of a powerforward with range. 3j seems much more like a tall sf to me.

i dont see them as redundant. and if both turn out well, then so much the better.

ainge should, and will, go for the best player available. if it is nicholson, great. if not, i trust ainge to come away with a talented player or 3 in this draft.

I agree, I dont think JJJ comes into play at all with the draft. Even if he did his game is different from Nicholson's. I believe JJJ will eventually play a Hakim Warrick style role as a running 4/3. Nicholson needs to add muscle but if he measures at least 6'8 with out shoes and truly has a 7'3"+ wingspan then he becomes more of a 4/5 with range. I agree with the previous post that he could be a longer version of Bass.
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2012, 02:17:21 PM »

Offline pp34isthe1

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 422
  • Tommy Points: 40
I dont understand the hype of 3J. He hasnt proven anything. He isnt the type of player that would hold Danny back from drafting another similar to him. I know its WAY to early to tell but really I dont see him much in future plans, unless he has an outstanding summer leauge/training camp.

To answer the thread, Royce White is the exact player Danny would target, high risk with high reward. Get him the best counseling NBA money can buy and pray that he can get over the fear of flight and extensive conditioning.

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #13 on: May 14, 2012, 02:21:46 PM »

Offline Celts Fan 92

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1423
  • Tommy Points: 122
idk if Miller is gonna fall to 21 or 22 tbh if he does we gotta take him we need scoring in dis draft nd hope Doc gives him time if he's picked up

Re: Drafting for go-to scoring potential
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2012, 02:29:33 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
Quote
ainge will be taking quite a few factors into consideration, but honestly i dont think he would pass on nicholson because of 3j. 3j has looked talented on offense, but a bit lost on defense.

from the videos, nicholson is much more likely to be able to play nearer the basket and seems more of a powerforward with range. 3j seems much more like a tall sf to me.

i dont see them as redundant. and if both turn out well, then so much the better.

ainge should, and will, go for the best player available. if it is nicholson, great. if not, i trust ainge to come away with a talented player or 3 in this draft.

I agree, I dont think JJJ comes into play at all with the draft. Even if he did his game is different from Nicholson's. I believe JJJ will eventually play a Hakim Warrick style role as a running 4/3. Nicholson needs to add muscle but if he measures at least 6'8 with out shoes and truly has a 7'3"+ wingspan then he becomes more of a 4/5 with range. I agree with the previous post that he could be a longer version of Bass.

With the 3J comparison, I mean a 4 with offense but suspect on defense.  When Danny drafted defensively average (or worse) players, he traded them as bargaining chips.  For keepers (e.g., Perk and Rondo), the best defensive players stayed.  And I don't see the C's changing their philosophy this time around.