Shocking that anyone, much less fans who seem to have some knowledge, would feel that Chris Paul is no better than Rondo.
No way the clippers win a playoff game without Chris Paul.
If we had Chris Paul, I would like our team a whole lot more.
Teams don't even cover Rondo. Just pause and think about that for a moment. The last high level player you could say that about was Ben Wallace. Ben Wallace had jaw dropping talents and put up huge numbers (like Rondo) but also like Rondo was not an elite player because of his weaknesses. Ben Wallace was a fine player and made meaningful contributions to playoff teams, like Rondo.
To me, saying Rondo = Paul is the same as saying Wallace = Karl Malone.
At any rate, I hope Danny can find a GM that shares the high opinion of Rondo that some on CB seem to have. Maybe the clippers will trade Paul to us for Rondo.
That comparison is pretty weak. Rajon Rondo is one of the NBA's best 2-way players, Ben Wallace was one of the NBA's best defenders only. Plus, completely different eras.
I do think that CP3 is the better player in a vacuum. Like Rondo's he's a prolific passer, elite defender, and a high level competitor, but he's a much more versatile scorer.
I think saying Rondo=Paul is like saying Bynum=Howard. Both players are elite for their position, and in the upper level of NBA players as a whole, but maybe not necessarily equivalent.