This triple double garbage is getting a little carried away. I understand that versatility and multiple skills and contributing in many ways is cool and all, but didn't Rondo take 22 shots to get 17 points? 7 for 22 from the field? I mean, he played alright, but lets not give him league MVP for reaching double digits in 3 categories.
Which game would you rather have (and this is purely hypothetical) -
Player A - 10 points (4-20 FG, 0-3 3PT, 2-4 FT), 10 rebounds, 10 assists, 7 turnovers
Player B - 34 points (10-20 FG, 2-4 3PT, 12-14 FT), 18 rebounds, 6 assists, 1 turnover
Player A has a "triple double". Player B does not.
Which game would you rather have from your star player (hypothetical, could be anyone).
The point is, that not all triple double games are better than all non-triple double games. Rondo having a triple double doesn't mean he has had a better playoff than Chris Paul or LeBron James or anyone else.