Author Topic: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?  (Read 8468 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?
« Reply #30 on: March 17, 2012, 05:25:05 PM »

Offline KGs Knee

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12765
  • Tommy Points: 1546
I would have to think there are definitely better options.  That being said, the better options aren't very many.  We could do worse, i.e. nobody at all.

Re: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?
« Reply #31 on: March 17, 2012, 06:17:52 PM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
Sheed's per 36 minutes numbers were atrocious.

14.4 points 6.6 rebounds 40.9 fg% 28% from 3pt. Terrible and can only get worse. He was too out of shape to play D so he gave up his fouls.

Apparently we have different definitions of "atrocious."

Re: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?
« Reply #32 on: March 17, 2012, 06:19:10 PM »

Offline aporel#18

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2332
  • Tommy Points: 170

http://vimeo.com/23895263

Sheed over JO on any day...

Re: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?
« Reply #33 on: March 17, 2012, 06:52:59 PM »

Offline CelticsFanNC

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 572
  • Tommy Points: 74
  If Sheed were to come back I believe he would want to come back to a legitimate title contender which the Celtic's are not.

Re: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?
« Reply #34 on: March 17, 2012, 07:09:32 PM »

Offline jarufu

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 536
  • Tommy Points: 123

http://vimeo.com/23895263

Sheed over JO on any day...

That's a weird thing to happen in this forum, I actually know that girl.

If Sheed is the last resort then it couldn't hurt, could it?  I'd rather Turiaf though .. some company for Pietrus at least..
Stay classy, San Diego. Hello, Baxter? Baxter, is that you? Bark twice if you're in Milwaukee. Is this Wilt Chamberlain? Have the decency to say something.

Re: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2012, 07:47:06 PM »

Offline coco

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2722
  • Tommy Points: 147
I would have to think there are definitely better options.  That being said, the better options aren't very many.  We could do worse, i.e. nobody at all.

"Nobody" IS a better option than Sheed.

If Danny bring Sheed I'll stop watching. Especially if Sheed plays ahead of Stiesma and JJJ.

Re: So NOW is it time to sign Sheed?
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2012, 07:56:07 PM »

Offline Bingbangbarros

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 148
  • Tommy Points: 6
Sheed's per 36 minutes numbers were atrocious.

14.4 points 6.6 rebounds 40.9 fg% 28% from 3pt. Terrible and can only get worse. He was too out of shape to play D so he gave up his fouls.

Apparently we have different definitions of "atrocious."

I'm not sure what you mean. Are you considering 6.6 rebounds and 41% shooting from your PF/C good?