Thanks for the data on KG Jon.
I understand what people are saying about Doc setting his rotation for the playoffs, tightening it up.
But I think a great quality is also being flexible when circumstances change - and to me, particularly with the loss of Wilcox, in addition to Jermaine, they most certainly have.
If we still had KG, Bass, Wilcox & Stiemsma, I'd say fine, rotate those four players and only play JJJ if you have to.
However, at this point, if one of KG, Stiemsma or Bass gets nicked up and misses even a couple game, you will have no choice but to bring JJJ off the bench - unless we've signed another decent big man somehow.
Therefore, I think whether you want to play JJJ or not you can potentially do more damage at this point by not playing him, because:
1. You're going to end up grinding KG down so he's not as fresh as the season rolls on.
2. JJJ won't end up looking like a deer in the headlights when his number is called.
3. You might get pleasantly suprised by what the kid can offer on nights when it's working well for him.
4. In the end, your team becomes stronger.
For me, without any reservation, I begin inserting JJJ into the lineup now. And if he's in there and we're doing Ok, keeping or building the lead, I leave him in for as long as possible, every game, every night, for the rest of the season.
You never know - you might be able to hide some JJJ's weaknesses by putting him in with a lineup of Rondo, Pietrus, Pierce and KG.
The you could come with Stiemmsa, Bass, Pierce or Pietrus, Ray and Bradley.
The short term upshot is the kid contributes and we increase our bigs rotation to four and keep KG's minutes down in the process.
The long term upshot is the kid is that much farther along for next season.