0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: wdleehi on March 02, 2012, 09:39:34 AMQuote from: Moranis on March 01, 2012, 09:14:12 PMQuote from: wdleehi on March 01, 2012, 12:31:12 PMNot a fan of this trade. Nelson is a minus and Anderson is good role player.17/7 is not a role player.Yes it is. He is not a star.He is a good role player that has found a team that he fits so well in. He's a player capable of star-level production who will be under-rated by some people because they associate stardom with volume scorers who can play iso-ball, whether efficient or not. That's ok. There are people who seemed to think Ray Allen was really just a glorified role player who happened to be really, really good at hitting threes and didn't see him as a Hall of Fame talent until he won a title with the Celtics and started approaching the three point record.
Quote from: Moranis on March 01, 2012, 09:14:12 PMQuote from: wdleehi on March 01, 2012, 12:31:12 PMNot a fan of this trade. Nelson is a minus and Anderson is good role player.17/7 is not a role player.Yes it is. He is not a star.He is a good role player that has found a team that he fits so well in.
Quote from: wdleehi on March 01, 2012, 12:31:12 PMNot a fan of this trade. Nelson is a minus and Anderson is good role player.17/7 is not a role player.
Not a fan of this trade. Nelson is a minus and Anderson is good role player.
Quote from: LooseCannon on March 02, 2012, 09:40:03 PMQuote from: wdleehi on March 02, 2012, 09:39:34 AMQuote from: Moranis on March 01, 2012, 09:14:12 PMQuote from: wdleehi on March 01, 2012, 12:31:12 PMNot a fan of this trade. Nelson is a minus and Anderson is good role player.17/7 is not a role player.Yes it is. He is not a star.He is a good role player that has found a team that he fits so well in. He's a player capable of star-level production who will be under-rated by some people because they associate stardom with volume scorers who can play iso-ball, whether efficient or not. That's ok. There are people who seemed to think Ray Allen was really just a glorified role player who happened to be really, really good at hitting threes and didn't see him as a Hall of Fame talent until he won a title with the Celtics and started approaching the three point record.He is not Ray Allen.He is 3 point shooting big man that is very good.But he is still a role player.
