0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I liked the Parker trade to SA a lot more when I thought Jennings would be there for Philly at 2.2. Now, not as much.
Quote from: 33-00-32 on February 14, 2012, 11:51:30 AMQuote from: wdleehi on February 14, 2012, 11:49:19 AMQuote from: Fafnir on February 14, 2012, 11:34:17 AMI honestly did a massive double take when I saw how far down the Spurs fell.So did I. I had them in the top half.The biggest issue with the non-snake draft is not the best teams, it is the middle top. Teams that can be good because of depth no longer in position to really build that depth.I agree with this. Once you get past the top 3-4 teams you don't have two All-Star keepers. I think things level off pretty quickly after the 1st or 2nd round.I say just start working the phones.Look at nick and I. We had arguably the worst starting position of any team, because there were no two-star combos left; we started with a crappy pick, and the Cleveland Cavs. We're now psyched with our lineup of Irving/Deng/Bogut, and we have two #2s and moved up in the 3rd. Having a mediocre team and a mediocre pick is going to suck if you're inactive, but if you do some diligence, I think you can really improve your situation.
Quote from: wdleehi on February 14, 2012, 11:49:19 AMQuote from: Fafnir on February 14, 2012, 11:34:17 AMI honestly did a massive double take when I saw how far down the Spurs fell.So did I. I had them in the top half.The biggest issue with the non-snake draft is not the best teams, it is the middle top. Teams that can be good because of depth no longer in position to really build that depth.I agree with this. Once you get past the top 3-4 teams you don't have two All-Star keepers. I think things level off pretty quickly after the 1st or 2nd round.
Quote from: Fafnir on February 14, 2012, 11:34:17 AMI honestly did a massive double take when I saw how far down the Spurs fell.So did I. I had them in the top half.The biggest issue with the non-snake draft is not the best teams, it is the middle top. Teams that can be good because of depth no longer in position to really build that depth.
I honestly did a massive double take when I saw how far down the Spurs fell.
The Hawks are just hording picks, I'm interested in what that finished product is going to be.
I have 2.2. Am I supposed to pick now?
With the first pick, the Toronto Raptors select Brandon Jennings.
Quote from: Lucky17 on February 14, 2012, 12:28:29 PMI liked the Parker trade to SA a lot more when I thought Jennings would be there for Philly at 2.2. Now, not as much.I still think it's a good trade for Philly, I still see plenty of talent at the 1. Enough where I think you could even hold off another round and still get a good talent.
Quote from: Celtic Fan Forever on February 14, 2012, 12:18:21 PMWith the first pick, the Toronto Raptors select Brandon Jennings.And there goes my gamble.
Quote from: StartOrien on February 14, 2012, 12:33:15 PMQuote from: Lucky17 on February 14, 2012, 12:28:29 PMI liked the Parker trade to SA a lot more when I thought Jennings would be there for Philly at 2.2. Now, not as much.I still think it's a good trade for Philly, I still see plenty of talent at the 1. Enough where I think you could even hold off another round and still get a good talent. says the GM who may also be looking for a good option in this round...
Quote from: StartOrien on February 14, 2012, 12:33:15 PMQuote from: Lucky17 on February 14, 2012, 12:28:29 PMI liked the Parker trade to SA a lot more when I thought Jennings would be there for Philly at 2.2. Now, not as much.I still think it's a good trade for Philly, I still see plenty of talent at the 1. Enough where I think you could even hold off another round and still get a good talent. Yep, pretty much the onl;y reason I was okay in letting go of Tony because I thought I can have him at 2.2. Now I got to work.