If we're healthy and we play defense like we've been playing the last couple weeks, the older guys are moving and shooting like they have been, Rondo is getting the ball where it needs to be, and the young/new guys keep buying into Doc's plan, we can beat anyone. Miami is not as unbeatable as some people think, and they have some obvious weaknesses to exploit.
Isn't "shooting like they have been" an outcome, not a pre-condition? It Rondo "getting the ball where it needs to be" also an outcome? If we are asking whether we can do those things against Miami, tautologically, if we are able to do those things than we can successfully do those things.
Personally, I think we have a lot of talent, though the older talent is unreliable as top level talent at this point. When I say unreliable, I mean for the kinds of performances we need in the playoffs. This will often make us underdogs.
Of course it's a precondition, as anything is in the past, that's why I used the word "if" ... it's conditional.
Honestly, the samantics discussions I've had in the last two months is more than the sum total of all the other time I've been here, (maybe it's contagious nitpicking - it seems to spread like wildfire).
I'm not sure, but I think it's the last resort to pick someone's statement apart when there's nothing very tangible to disagree with or summarize. I was saying that if the team's level of play is consistent with of late, then I believe they can beat any team in the NBA.
I know you knew where I was coming from and what point I was making, as similar statements have been used a thousand times on ths blog without such analysis of word usage and references to rhetorical meanings unintended.
I do love that we're underdogs, though ... we've always seemed to respond well to adversity. Time will tell, (alas, more rhetoric ... I guess I come by it naturally). Can time actually tell
anything?