Author Topic: Something I don't understand...  (Read 7391 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #15 on: January 30, 2012, 02:05:02 AM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
I didn't like the lack of reaction either, especially cus I've seen rondo stick up for guys multiple times for fouling too hard and things like that. And am i the only one who remembers when it was Kleiza last year that when Rondo was on the ground, he went out of his way to walk on Rondo's ankle and add pressure to it and left Rondo in pain?  Cant find the clip but that really stuck out to me
U are right was him he's dirty
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2012, 02:26:02 AM »

Offline TuneSquad52

  • Chris Boucher
  • Posts: 11
  • Tommy Points: 1
Yeah completely agree, although ive seen worse, youve gotta stick up for your mates. Even if its just getting in his face or something. Let them know youre there

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2012, 03:36:27 PM »

Offline ScoobyDoo

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2649
  • Tommy Points: 447
Yeah, that's all I'm talking about - get in the guy's space and let him know that is not cool.

In this scenario, I see nothing wrong with a shove / bump and some heated words, head to head with a clear warning - that's it. That's all it takes.

I'm not advocating cold cocking the guy.

You must stand up for your team mates. This also forces the hand of the Refs and the NBA to get control of flagrant fouls.

And to me anyone who sends someone vertical when they are going head long for the rim, should be automatically suspended for 10 games without pay. Kleiza could just have easily either not fouled Rondo or grabbed him and try to prevent his fall. What is Rondo had shattered his strong hand (right) in 3 places and never fully recovered from it again?

Bynum's play on Barea last year? Automatic 10 game suspension, or more really, would be fine with me.

And until the NBA successfully eliminates these types of plays by implementing "severe" consequences, I'm getting after guys that make plays like that on team mates.

I think it is really, really, easy to interpret intent on plays like this. You're either trying to make an honest play on the ball or you're whacking the guy, it's pretty simple.

Kleiza's play was the latter...     

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2012, 10:24:49 PM »

Offline TuneSquad52

  • Chris Boucher
  • Posts: 11
  • Tommy Points: 1
Yeah i completely agree with where youre coming from. NBA is so foul heavy these days in trying to protect the players, yet when it comes to the crunch and flagrant fouls are occurring they go pretty soft. In the basketball here in australia they are pretty lenient with fouls, nothing too soft but when it comes to people committing pure flagrant fouls they get dealt with much more severely then they do over there in the states

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #19 on: January 31, 2012, 12:30:53 PM »

Offline ScoobyDoo

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2649
  • Tommy Points: 447
Yeah Tunesquad52, agreed. I think maybe one's opinion on this is affected by where you grew up and what the attitude was regarding this stuff.

I grew up in Maine and in that time there were certain things you just don't do. For example, you do not touch a Lobsterman's traps and you don't take guys out at the knees or when they're in mid air. And if you do, you can expect to get punched in the head, maybe literally (a fight) or figuratively, in the form of a very heated shoving and yelling match to lay down the line and call the BS when it happens.

I can tell you from experience that if it's a Lobster trap where talking about, you can expect a fist fight that you won't win...

On the court, it would rarely mean a fight with punches thrown - but most often a "very" heated discussion with some heavy shoving and a clear "warning" to the guy who did it about the consequences for him if it happens again. And there most definitely would be consequences.

And playground ball was played with the "no blood, no foul" rule, which just meant don't call ticky tack fouls, get after it, but don't be an idiot and go around clobbering guys.

This lead to some incredibly physical and competitive games that were a blast. But there is such and easy and clear line to see between a great, physical brand of basketball and "dangerous" basketball - and you "never" make dangerous plays on the court, that's not what the game's about and it's unacceptable.

So I'm for very severe penalties against guys who make those plays and/or guys who initiate a confrontation that leads to a donnybrook on the court.

Based on friends I've known from Australia, my perception is that you guys don't cop any BS down there so it doesn't suprise me that flagrant plays come with stiffer penalties than here in the US game.

It's a really interesting point of debate to me, because it's about the psychology of how different people look at this issue and I think a lot of that depends on how you came up.     

There was an interesting story about two young, rogue male elephants who were harassing and in some cases attacking and killing other elephants within their group. They couldn't figure out why these two rogue males were acting so unusually for the longest time and they tried everything they could think of to put an end to it without success. Then it dawned on one of the researchers that most of the adult males in the herd had been killed for their tusks. So they identified two alpha adult male elephants from another herd and mixed them in with this other heard that was having so much trouble. The two adult males very quickly kicked the crap out of the two, young rogue elephants over the period of about 2-3 weeks every time they were bullying the other members of the heard. The problem was quickly diffused and the two rogue elephants assimilated back into the herd without another instance of bad behavior.

Point is, controlled and direct confrontation is Ok, in fact it's a a very good thing in my book. And if a player is making dangerous plays on a team mate of mine on the court, they're going to get an earful and some confrontation immediately when it happens.

And that will continue until the NBA and its Refs decide to make it so painful to the perpetrator of plays like that - that you don't see it anymore.

Again, I'm all for hard fouls when necessary (meaning tying someone up or a hard slap across the arms as they're up for a shot, major wrestling matches in the post, bump and grind D and heavy banging on the boards.

But you don't take anyone out in mid air - you try to hold them up and make sure they land Ok - and if you do make the play, expect some guys in your grill to discuss it with you - and a lot more than that if you do it again.       
       

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2012, 12:59:08 PM »

Offline TripleOT

  • Chat Moderator
  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1993
  • Tommy Points: 213
Kleiza took a cheapie at Rondo, and no one on the Cs did a darn thing about it.  At a minimum, the next possession, his man should have run Klieza around a few big man screens and one of the bigs should have clocked him in the chest with an elbow.   

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #21 on: January 31, 2012, 01:10:48 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21271
  • Tommy Points: 2452
The Heat and Knicks brawl in 1997 and the Malice at the Palace changed these type of actions forever.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #22 on: January 31, 2012, 01:27:22 PM »

Offline ScoobyDoo

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2649
  • Tommy Points: 447
Yeah, TripleOT, exactly my sentiment and that screen should have been preceeded by a heated exchange with Kleiza immediately after he leveled Rondo.

This is a man's game, you simply do not allow that to happen without addressing it as a player.

Again, I am not saying to cold cock the guy and start a melee. You talk to the guy, face to face, and give him a hard screen, much like KG gave Pachulia a few years back. Nothing dangerous, just tough and a message.

And I completely understand your point Chief regarding Detroit and the Heat / Knicks. So while it's stopped the escalations, it hasn't stopped the potentially career threatening plays on guys who are airborne, oddly.

And I would call Kleiza's play on Rondo, as well as Bynum's play on Barea, both potentially career threatening. Just because they didn't result in catastrophic injury to either guard is irrelevant. Barea could have landed on his head, Rondo could have shattered his right wrist on that landing.

Isn't there some gray area between starting a brawl and making a point with the player who just assaulted your team mate? That's all I'm advocating. That might simply mean some very aggressive language at Kleiza...but you have to register it with the guy or he won't take you seriously at all. 

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2012, 02:13:18 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10267
  • Tommy Points: 352
The play where Kleiza hit Rondo was clearly a flagrant to me. Rondo was mid air, way up there going for the rim and Kleiza didn't really make a play on the ball, hit him in the chest with his forearms and then extended his arms out putting Rondo vertical for a very hard landing.

This is one of those plays where Rondo "easily" could have broken his wrist or done something worse.

And yet.....no one from our team clocked Kleiza. I just cannot comprehend this.

Now, when I say "clocked" I do not mean punch, I mean coming into the play with some steam and shoving Kleiza into the second row or driving him up into the stansion and then getting very, very verbal with the guy.

Give me the tech, give me a one game suspension if you have to, I'll take it and gladly pay the fines - you're not going to make that level of dangerous play on a teammate of mine without a price and without having it made very clear to you that you that your turn is coming.

And to be honest I don't care what the team policy is or what the coaches say. That play on my teamamte, if I'm on the court...you're getting a piece of me.

Thoughts - why was no one AT THE LEAST in Kleiza's grill in a head to head conversation?

Thoughts?     

The same thought occurred to me when it happened. TP.
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'

You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.

C.S. Lewis

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2012, 02:15:34 PM »

Offline CelticG1

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Tommy Points: 288
Was it that bad? Doc didn't seem upset during or after the game.

Did the NBA go back and declare it a flagrant?

this seems like more the exception than the rule. If there was a pattern of this maybe itd be worried

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2012, 03:08:00 PM »

Offline ScoobyDoo

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2649
  • Tommy Points: 447
That's one thing I don't like about Doc, he tells his players to just play when they take a cheap shot. Get them back by winning, I get that. He never gets upset with the player's who whack our guy - I disagree with that.

But at the same time, I think you should verbally get in someone's grill when they cheap shot you.

I'd prefer it if our guys spent less time jawing at the Refs and more time taking  a stand against other players when they cheap shot one of our guys.

Again, not cold cocking the guy, but at a minimum getting very verbally aggressive with the guy who did it, and maximum giving him a good shove in the chest.

 

 

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2012, 08:16:15 PM »

Offline TuneSquad52

  • Chris Boucher
  • Posts: 11
  • Tommy Points: 1
exactly scoobydoo, being brought up to stand up for yourself is something which should be transitioned onto the court and this includes standing up for your team-mates. And the worst part is fans love the emotions yet the nba wants to squash it all, i just dont get it.

but oh well, guess this is modern era basketball. Cant really do much.

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #27 on: January 31, 2012, 08:36:47 PM »

Online Neurotic Guy

  • Bob Cousy
  • **************************
  • Posts: 26060
  • Tommy Points: 2751
I agree with you that the NBA should come down much harder than they do on these incidents and that that would "also" go a long way towards having a better product on the floor.

Until I see that day, I will make my own line in the sand and do the job to protect myself and my teammates.

I guess I grew up in an era where confrontation is Ok, and actually very healthy. And there is a clear difference to me between physically assaulting someone in the form of a punch and giving someone a good bump or shove and then engaging in a heated conversation with them, letting them know what just happened is not ok.

I think we all experienced bullies growing up. I never got whacked and ran crying to my Mom and Dad to make the bad guy go away. If you didn't stand your ground, you would continue to get whacked, especially if the teachers weren't always there to monitor and/or punish the bully correctly.
    

A couple of points:
1. We don't know what the players saw in real time so it's hard to judge his teammates' toughness when we don't know their perspective.

2. NBA and school grounds are not analogous.  Adults... Kids.... you know.  I hear that you aren't advocating a punch and I  agree that it called for some heated words and some posturing.  But I think acting with level head and playing the game with heated energy is the most effective response.

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #28 on: February 01, 2012, 12:00:59 AM »

Offline bfrombleacher

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3343
  • Tommy Points: 367
The play where Kleiza hit Rondo was clearly a flagrant to me. Rondo was mid air, way up there going for the rim and Kleiza didn't really make a play on the ball, hit him in the chest with his forearms and then extended his arms out putting Rondo vertical for a very hard landing.

This is one of those plays where Rondo "easily" could have broken his wrist or done something worse.

And yet.....no one from our team clocked Kleiza. I just cannot comprehend this.

Now, when I say "clocked" I do not mean punch, I mean coming into the play with some steam and shoving Kleiza into the second row or driving him up into the stansion and then getting very, very verbal with the guy.

Give me the tech, give me a one game suspension if you have to, I'll take it and gladly pay the fines - you're not going to make that level of dangerous play on a teammate of mine without a price and without having it made very clear to you that you that your turn is coming.

And to be honest I don't care what the team policy is or what the coaches say. That play on my teamamte, if I'm on the court...you're getting a piece of me.

Thoughts - why was no one AT THE LEAST in Kleiza's grill in a head to head conversation?

Thoughts?    

Below is from: http://celticshub.com/2012/01/19/highlight-gallery-celtics-96-raptors-73/

Quote
But then Kleiza comes down with his right arm and gives Rondo an extra shove towards the floor – while Rondo is in mid-air and unable to protect himself. This play could easily have resulted in Rondo walking off with a shattered or dislocated elbow or wrist. That’s not tough defense. It’s a cheap shot. And it’s cowardly.

This is exactly the kind of play the NBA should be cracking down on. But Rondo walked off, so they won’t.

Here’s another thing I hate about this play, because it’s emblematic of the softening of this Boston roster: nobody did anything about it. There was no confrontation between the C’s and Raptors and even if it would have amounted to just pushing and bluster, it would have indicated this team still has the fire necessary for me to believe they can turn this season around.

Imagine what would have happened if Boston had James Posey, Tony Allen and Kendrick Perkins on the floor when Kleiza pulled that move. I don’t long for any of their returns (okay, maybe TA) but for the collective attitude and physicality they added to this team over the last four years. It’s not there anymore. Boston is a team that can be pushed around. And they won’t always push back.

We were falling apart and weren't playing as a team. The camaraderie just wasn't there. Right now, I can imagine JO and KG sizing Kleiza up.

Re: Something I don't understand...
« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2012, 04:40:42 AM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
I'd rather just wait a few months or even a year and sneak in a cheap shot/flagrant foul in retaliation when they have dropped their guard and aren't expecting one.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference