I'll continue, not to mention it's essentially pretextual. Given that the NBA's product is displays of competition, how exactly would some sort of player level collusion bring their product to new heights?
It would do the exact opposite, bring their product to new lows.
This is all based on opinion.
You're saying it brings it to new lows...
Anyone can argue that it brings it to new heights and once the playoffs and finals come around, the product is MUCH better for the viewing audience.
What gets the most ratings? Die hards like us want different things from basketball.
Casual fans want to watch the best players duke it out for the championship- the most athletic, skilled and gifted players on the planet.
It's great to see the under dog win, but rarely does it happen.
Imagine how good it would be to watch a Lakers team with Chris Paul and Kobe and Bynum and Gasol vs Bosh, Wade and Lebron in a 7 game finals series?
Again, one can argue that taking two/three studs and sticking them on one team creates a competitive streak in the NBA and ignites a new level of product at the top of the food chain.
Yes, the bottom dwellers do suffer but they will get their chance- that's what the draft is for. ie OKC, Memphis, Chicago.
As Celtics fans I don't think we can hate on the idea of stars ganging up to win a flag.
Lebron never stood a chance with that garbage roster that his terrible management glued together around him. What was he supposed to do?
What is Howard supposed to do when Otis Smith gets Turkoglu and Arenas and those other bums locked up for 3-4 years at a time with no cap room left?
I understand your sentiment but if you want the toughest competition in some aspects these super teams are the best way to achieve a great,exciting,unpredictable playoffs.