No, Dooling has been hitting his shots well enough that Eddie wouldn't add anything.
Exactly. If we are going to add anyone at this point, it would be someone who can create offense, not just a spot shooter.
posey and house where jus spot shooters..when they both where on the floor we had so many options and it werked
Oh, I agree. But we already have Dooling, Pietrus, along with Pierce and Allen who both have become more spot up shooters than they were in 2007. Also, Bass, Stiemsma, and KG are also shooters (to some degree).
I think this team has the shooters, what they need is playmakers. Beyond Rondo, and Pierce on occasion, they really do not have guys who can consistently make plays. So, if they are going to make a move, it would be for someone like that IMO.
I will also add that I don't think things are as bad as they look at the moment, and I don't think the C's desperately need another playmaker.
Like you said, it worked with spot-up shooters before, and that was because the C's played a shorter rotation, and those guys were playing with Rondo and Pierce a lot.
Right now, the C's are dealing with the schedule, which means that they are playing the second unit on their own much more than they will in the playoffs. Come playoff time, when Rondo is playing 40 minutes per game, and Pierce is on the floor pretty much any time Rondo isn't, the need for more playmakers will be dramatically less.
But as far as holes to fill, that would be the hole they would be looking for, over another spot up shooter.
Topic: Is Eddie House worth a look? (Read 5792 times)