By the same token once people start breaking down players according to race and it just continues the perpetual segregation of people based on skin color, ethnicity, sexual preference, etc. It just assist in keeping the differences of people in the limelight no matter how much this country attempts to make sure that such things are taken out of society so that society can kill racial, sexual, and other horrible bias that has existed in this country for centuries, to its detriment.
That's a heck of a snowball theory you've got there. The difference, Nick, is that everything I'm talking about is positive. If I see a player I particularly identify with and his race is a part of that I don't think its a negative thing, anymore than I would think it negative if a french person rooted harder for Tony Parker than he did for Dirk Nowitzki, based mostly on nationality.
The line as I said before, and as you alluded to, is when you are negatively rating other players based on race.
Examples:
1) I like Larry Bird. There aren't that many white guys out there who can ball like he can, and he grew up kinda like I did. I feel a common bond with him.
2) I hate watching the NBA because its just a bunch of thug trash.
One example is hate speech. That example is clearly not okay. To me however, there is a very discernible difference between example number 1 and example number 2, and it lies within its positivity.
It doesn't mean white fans can't like black players, and it doesn't mean black fans can't like white players. You draw your commonalities in this world where you can, and as long as its about love not hate, I don't think there is anything wrong with it.
People are people. It shouldn't matter what color they are, what religion they are, what ethnicity they are, what sex they are, or what sexual preference they are.
People should never be discriminated against because of those things, and since you've been around here a while, I'm going to egotistically assume that you have read some of my posts and understand I'm unilaterally passionate and consistent on this issue. But, we're not talking about discrimination here. Therein lies the difference.
Why is this thread allowed to be open and talked about? because the majority of the participants at this blog are white and so its okay to talk about the amount of white guys in the NBA?
I'm guessing if any of the following subjects were brought up at Celticblog they would get locked and deleted right away:
Is it just me or does the NBA seem to be getting gayer lately?
Is it just me or does the NBA seem to be getting Jewisher lately?
Is it just me or does the NBA seem to be getting African lately?
That's an interesting question. If a rash of NBA players came out of the closet, do you really think we wouldn't discuss it? We have already discussed Omri Casspi's religion and nationality in great detail. We've talked a lot about foreign players as well.
So why is this any different? Just because I large portion of Celticsblog members are white and identify with white players doesn't make it okay to continue to discuss the segregation of the NBA into parts via racial and color lines.
Nick, if you're going to answer your own questions why do you ask them? (kidding)
I don't think this thread (although to be fair I have not read all 6 pages, I've done most of my commenting from my phone so I don't know if I missed a blowup or something) has done anything wrong along the lines that you're talking about. It was asked if there are more white american players. It was answered, and discussed, without malice or discrimination.
People are people. Players are players. Can't we just leave it at that?
This is going to sound a bit grandstandish, but since you got a little passionate about it, allow me some latitude if you will.
I respect your position on this, but in my opinion, I think what you're doing here is detrimental (not as damaging as discrimination or anything, it just limits the conversation) to the concept of racial equity.
I think that answering any discussion about race, or ethnicity, or any other line you want to use as an example with 'people are people' is just non-productive. We have eyes, he have minds, and we know when there are differences between folks. Our salvation, in my mind, lies not in disregarding race, or sexual orientation, or whatever thing it is that stands as a barrier. Humanity has never, ever done this. It lies in understanding the differences, because hate is begotten by fear, and fear is begotten by a lack of understanding.
I feel like, as long as you ensure a lack of discrimination, and talk candidly, it will increase understanding, and it will decrease the hate.
Parallel goals, but different roads I guess.