Why do we have to play by those rules?
You mean ... the basic rules of logic?
You don't have any proof that elite players WANT to play for the Celtics either.
You really don't understand burden of proof, do you?
Why do anonymous sources not count? Sure, they can be fabricated.
Congratulations, you answered your own question!
But there are currently no fabrications from anonymous sources that these players actually want to play for the Celtics either.
So ... nobody is lying about wanting to come to the Celtics, so nobody does? Ever?
Instead we've "heard" through "sources" that players want to go (to a small list) and Boston is not included. And we've also have "heard" through "sources" that if forced to go to Boston, said player would not "re-sign" with us. We've also "heard" through "sources" that said players would "prefer" to go to a short list of cities. (Boston not among them). I personally have not heard through anonymous sources that said players WANT to come to Boston. So if you want to play like this. Show me the proof that they DO want to come to Boston!
NOT A SINGLE NBA PLAYER HAS SPECIFICALLY SAID THEY DO NOT WANT TO PLAY HERE. Until one does, it is not reasonable to assume there is some league-wide boycott of the city and the team. Indeed, all of this sources are about leverage during negotiations; we don't know who said them, and as thus, they are not reliable indicators of what the player wants. And where are these mythical lists? Someone please show me a list that a player made of cities they want to play in, because I would love to see it.
Seriously, do you think that Chris Paul has a little sticky note saying 1-Los Angeles, 2-New York, etc. etc? No. Elite players want to play for a winning team that can give them a big contract. Before 2008 Boston was not a winning team, and after 2008 has not been in a situation where we can give out big contracts. We have to wait until 2012 to see what how free agency responds to Boston before we can claim that elite players are mysteriously boycotting a team that averaged 58+ wins that last few seasons.
There are over 70 responses here contributing why elite players appear to have reasons not to want to play for the Celtics.
So far this thread is conjecture and largely inaccurate arguments about the racial landscape of Boston. Not exactly a reliable source, is it?
Yet you debunk it because you don't have any proof from the players themselves. It's not often you see players blatantly bad mouth a city and say they refuse to go certain places.
And yet this thread is claiming that is EXACTLY what players are doing! Welcome to my page.
Instead the actions
What actions? In a year that we have no cap space and no real trade assets no big free agents came here? Can you name a single instance in recent league history where a player has clamored to go a team that DIDN'T HAVE EITHER THE CAP SPACE OR THE TRADE ASSETS to acquire them? Honestly, this stuff isn't that difficult. David West is an elite player, and he WANTED to come here. But money came first, as it does for 99.999% of people, including basketball players. If next year when we have the cap space and still can't get free agents, THEN you can make the argument that elite players don't want to play here. But it is incredibly unreasonable to assume that players are going to come out loud and strong about wanting to play here in a year where we can't sign or trade for them.
and the "leaks" speak louder.
It is truly amazing that you keep going on about these leaks. If that's how we are going to play, remember after the 2010 finals there was the leak that Dwight Howard said he would love to play with Rondo and Doc Rivers? There, argument over!
Not having players caught on camera or microphone saying "Don't send me to Boston" is just an easy out for you to poo-poo this thread.
And not having players clamoring to come to Boston in a year where it isn't conceivable for a free agent to sign here or be traded here is an easy way for the typically knee-jerk overreactions of this forum to cry about the end of times. Seriously, people here go crazy over the most minor perceived slights.
Okay, I am going to spell this out a third time, just to make sure you get it.
Before 2008, players wouldn't want to come to Boston, because we were excessively mediocre. Not a contender. Elite players want a contender.
After 2008, we have only had room for role players/sixth men, that kind of thing, due to our money being tied up in the Big 4. Elite players want a healthy contract (of course, we are ignoring that Shaq wanted to come play here, but that's besides the fact ...)
There is no reason to assume that elite players are mysteriously boycotting a winning franchise this year, because we are not in a situation where we can afford to make big signings, or big trades (everyone in the league knew Ainge wasn't giving away any of the Big 3, so our assets were limited).
And once again, you have NO PROOF OF YOUR ASSERTIONS. Whining that I can't disprove them doesn't change that fact, and is as logically tenable an argument as saying that a Flying Spaghetti Monster exists just because I can't prove it doesn't.
But, hey, if you really insist on arguing this point without proof, you win. In fact, Dr. Jerry Buss has paid $1 million to every NBA player to never come to Boston, and Danny Ainge is a plant. He won us one ring to get our confidence, then he is planning to drive the franchise into the ground. Then become GM of the Patriots and do the same thing. Why not? You can't prove there ISN'T a conspiracy, neener neener.
