It was a roller coaster ride.
-Really liked him out of the draft as excellent VALUE as a second rounder that could be a solid bench player for a few years, and perhaps starter if he really got in shape (so I was thinking for a second round pick we got a virtual lock 9-man rotation guy and a 5% shot at a legit long term starter).
-He seemed to live up to the 9-man rotation part, so I was happy in that sense: C's had in fact found value, getting a contributor from the second round. Really rare, actually.
-Because he outperformed his relative draft position and was "unique," he started getting really really overrated...like people thinking he'd inherit the PF starting spot, should be 6th man, etc. However, If he was a top-10 pick and did what he did, he'd be considered a bust; if he wasn't rolly poley and unique he'd be another journeyman valuable bench PF. It was only the exceeding of expectations and his uniqueness that made him stand out as more than 9-man contributor.
-So I stared getting worried he'd get overpaid, as in paid al harrington type money despite doing what guys like Bass, Craig Smith, etc. all do for less than harrington money.
-One pitfall that is common is to get too excited about how much relative value you acquired in a draft/trade and then totally submarine that value by overcompensating once that player is a free agent. If you are lucky enough to draft a 9-man contributor in the second round, you have to recognize that that's all he is, and be able to part ways when the time comes, and not confuse "being really good FOR WHERE HE WAS DRAFTED" with "being really good." Being better than expected does nothing to increase actual value. If you expect a 2 and get a 5, it's still not as good as a 6, even if you expected the 6 to be a 6 or even a 7. Pay or cut ties based on what they actually give you.