« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.5 percent? solution  (Read 2941 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

2.5 percent? solution
« on: October 21, 2011, 05:10:15 PM »

Offline ben

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 456
  • Tommy Points: 43
the nba owners have agreed to give the players 50percent.
the nbpa has agreed to give the owners 47.5percent. 

Let's start the season, and donate the left over 2.5 percent to charity.  ok? NBA Cares! great.  sheesh
Logged
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2011, 05:21:45 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
BTW, can we all agree that Mark Cuban could've had this thing solved over lunch?
Logged
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2011, 05:22:36 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62690
  • Tommy Points: -25472
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Who gets credit for the tax break? ;)
Logged


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2011, 05:45:35 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
I believe the "52.5%" figure is based on the players proposing a "band" where BRI varies from 50-53% based on total revenue. 

The owners calculated that on average this would translate to 52.5% BRI to the players, which is where that number comes from.  If their numbers are inaccurate or misleading, the actual effective % might be less than that.
Logged
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2011, 06:03:06 PM »

Offline action781

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 611
Quote from: fairweatherfan on October 21, 2011, 05:45:35 PM
I believe the "52.5%" figure is based on the players proposing a "band" where BRI varies from 50-53% based on total revenue. 

The owners calculated that on average this would translate to 52.5% BRI to the players, which is where that number comes from.  If their numbers are inaccurate or misleading, the actual effective % might be less than that.

Oh, I haven't actually heard anything about a 52.5% figure
Logged
2020 CelticsStrong All-2000s Draft -- Utah Jazz
 
Finals Starters:  Jason Kidd - Reggie Miller - PJ Tucker - Al Horford - Shaq
Bench:  Rajon Rondo - Trae Young - Marcus Smart - Jaylen Brown -  Peja Stojakovic - Jamal Mashburn - Carlos Boozer - Tristan Thompson - Mehmet Okur
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2011, 08:01:57 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Quote from: StartOrien on October 21, 2011, 05:21:45 PM
BTW, can we all agree that Mark Cuban could've had this thing solved over lunch?

  Somehow, I think you'd need Donald Trump, and it would be televised.
Logged
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2011, 10:22:48 AM »

Offline timpiker

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1725
  • Tommy Points: 113
Not sure I care about 50% or 53% or whatever.  I really care about  a HARD salary cap so that all teams can compete.  And I care about NON guaranteed contracts so that drunks like Vin Baker don't keep getting paid.
Logged
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2011, 10:35:36 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Quote from: timpiker on October 22, 2011, 10:22:48 AM
Not sure I care about 50% or 53% or whatever.  I really care about  a HARD salary cap so that all teams can compete.  And I care about NON guaranteed contracts so that drunks like Vin Baker don't keep getting paid.

Is somebody still paying Vin Baker?
Logged
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2011, 01:42:31 PM »

Offline Eris

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 46
  • Tommy Points: 12
Quote from: timpiker on October 22, 2011, 10:22:48 AM
Not sure I care about 50% or 53% or whatever.  I really care about  a HARD salary cap so that all teams can compete.  And I care about NON guaranteed contracts so that drunks like Vin Baker don't keep getting paid.
Personally, I think that if an owner is dumb enough to sign someone like Baker, Arenas, or Curry to a multi-year guaranteed contract they are getting what they deserve if they are forced to pay it. Non-guaranteed or partially guaranteed deals should be the norm.

OTOH, I'd like to see it set up where you can drop a player from the team...at any time...and have their salary come off the cap. The team still has to pay them, but their salary doesn't count against the team signing another player. The player would then be free to sign a new contract with another team with no effect on what their old team has to pay them. I'd be perfectly okay with a soft cap like they now have, or a harder one...with this rule.
Logged
Re: 2.5 percent? solution
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2011, 08:45:42 AM »

Offline greenpride32

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1310
  • Tommy Points: 83
Quote from: Eris on October 22, 2011, 01:42:31 PM
Personally, I think that if an owner is dumb enough to sign someone like Baker, Arenas, or Curry to a multi-year guaranteed contract they are getting what they deserve if they are forced to pay it. Non-guaranteed or partially guaranteed deals should be the norm.
How about pinning some of the blame on the players for not living up to their contracts?  Are you telling me Arenas and Curry never performed high enough to earn those contracts?  They did; and then they quit. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »