After SMU, I doubt the NCAA will ever have the cajones to dish out another "death penalty".
Totally astonishing the shear volume and level that this hits.
I don't find it astonishing at all. I would be much more astonished if the exact same thing wasn't going on at the majority of major programs.
To me, this is like steroids in baseball. Everyone has known its been going on, but they look the other way unless they are given a blatant reason to have to pay attention.
And even if they do go much further into it, they will barely touch the tip of it, since the system has been in place for years for all of this to go on unnoticed, since it is beneficial to the programs.
Totally agree. Miami's problem is that they got caught.
If the Miami program hadn't faded in prominence it would be treated with the same intense level of "dicipline" that Ohio State was..lol.
I'm thinking that Miami is going to be the NCAA skapegoat and used as an "example".
what was reported at Ohio State and Miami is world's apart. Miami is much much worse and it isn't close.
But the point is, if Miami was in the position Ohio State is, all this stuff being reported wouldn't have been found.
I am not one for conspiracies, but in this case I make an exception. I think the NCAA looks the other way whenever they can, particularly with a major program.
If there is something brought to their attention, like the Ohio State thing, they will make a show of it, and slap them on the wrist, but not really dig anymore.
With Miami, who have basically been in shambles for years anyways, they really will have no problem making an example of them, so they can say "look at how deep we dug, you can't say we look the other way".
This is just like the Mitchell Report in baseball. They chose a handful of scapegoats who were already basically at the end of their careers or retired. Big enough names, so that they wouldn't be accused of just going after the little fish, and then put on a dog and pony show.
I am not saying that Mitchell saw and ignored say, Alex Rodriguez or Albert Pujols, I just think he chose not to investigate them, the same way he investigated lesser players, and guys who were no longer a big asset to the league.
It's a great strategy, and it is very effective, because most people's first thought is "wow, they wouldn't throw a big star like Roger Clemens under the bus if they didn't have to"...but in reality, they had no problem with that, because it saved them from having to investigate the stars who were still selling tickets.