You find me improved individual numbers of an NBA player that have improved after serious knee problems. I'll start you off with two examples to the contrary. Tracy mcgrady and gilbert arenas.
My argument is not one for or against the trade, but one of perk being a fairly insignificant loss.
I would DEARLY LOVE someone to point to some individual NUMBERS in perks play to prove otherwise.
The difference in KG's play from last year is there for everyone to see. I know he didn't have a knee injury...but it was serious enough to make him miss a big chunk of the regular season and the playoffs.
Perk will be a better player next year as he will be more healthy. To say "he peaked years ago" and that "he is on a decline" is a stretch...you can use caps for added emphasis if you'd like.
I don't think Perk has peaked years ago but I think he is certainly in his prime and I don't see him getting significantly better. He will never even be close to an all star level player. He's a good defensive center but if he is a a top4 player on your team than your team probably isn't that good
I think a strong argument can be made that Perk is a top-4 player on OKC. It comes down to him vs. Harden. I'd give Perk the edge right now, although Harden has more upside.
Topic: Kendrick Perkins is making a difference for OKC because of Ibaka?? (Read 6680 times)