So we're the only team in the 2nd round as of this moment (Chicago looks like they'll close out the Pacers). However ESPN states, "With the only sweep of the first round, Boston made a statement against New York, but this season's Celtics still seem poorly equipped to make a deep playoff run. Beyond lacking a strong center and playing slowly, as we discussed previously, the Celtics had the lowest offensive rebounding rate in the league this year. Historically, that would mark them as possible playoff underperformers."
Lacking a strong center? Did they even watch the series? Jermaine O'Neal has OVER performed and has proven that when healthy he can be a great shot blocker and post defender. Also, we don't play slow we run half court sets and occasionally push the break with Rondo. As far as the rebounding KG has been handling that (Averaging about 10 a game), although when we were playing on help D we gave up a few more rebounds then we should of. But the Big Shamrock is coming back next round and should help with this a LOT!
My question to ESPN is why all the hate aimed at my team? The Lakers are currently tied with a Hornet's squad that is missing its 2nd Option (aka David West) and the Grizzlies are on the brink of eliminating the Spurs...oh and without their best player (Rudy Gay). ESPN you guys are a bunch of haters. Boston stand up!!!!!!!
Without even touching the 'ESPN is anti-boston" claim, I'd say juat about everything quoted was appropriate. Minus shaq, We DONT have a strong center. JO played great, but hes just back from injury, and playing limited minutes as he readjusts (saying that he has over performed just goes to show how low his expected production was). Then Krystic..nuff said.
Also we HAVE been playing slow. Yes, at their best the celts push the ball, but more often than not we've been doing half court sets, or walking the ball up..thats slow paced basketball. If you only "occasionally" push the ball (especially with just 1 player), you're certainly not a fast paced team.
As for rebounding...we have sucked. Period. To say otherwise is ridiculous. The whole reason the first 2 games versus NY were anywhere near as close as they were, is because we were getting severely out rebounded (and hustled). One player having moderate success does not constitute solid team rebounding.
I agree that the celts may not get their due (and can beat anyone any given night), but I dont think our 1st series performance was enough to change anyones minds. I'm ecstatic at the outcome, but I still acknowledge that the team we faced was probably more handicapped than just about any other team in the playoffs.