Agreed. Rose lack of decision-making/distribution/creativity skills are the main reason. He create shots for his teammates by attacking from a top pick'n'roll or an iso and forcing the defense to collapse on him. But he's not a floor-general by any means. There's a reason why the Bulls are an ordinary offensive team. Give Deron Williams that supporting cast and the Bulls are a top-5 offense.
wow, you give Deron that Bulls team and I'm not confident the Celtics can get past them. Deron is huge, D-Rose, not so much.
By the way, I remember watching D'Antoni playing in Milan, and he was a great player, all smarts and guts. I was surprised when I saw his coaching style, but with Steve Nash on board he looked like a great coach.
I can see he's frustrated, but it's not a great thing to say if you are an NBA coach.
I think D'Antoni is a great coach. He's a true believer in his system, so he needs players that fit it.
Great coaches come up with a system to fit the players they have as opposed to needing players that fit a certain system to coach effectively.
How many coaches have made drastic changes to their coaching philosophies? AND had success?
I'll count Popovich because he actually did AND had the best record, but nobody will be surprised if they don't make the WCF.
But nobody in my mind has won championships with different styles. Phil has 11 championships running the triangle. Pop won 4 with the same slow, defensive style.
And I think it's safe to say if D'Antoni couldn't win - or even make a Finals - with those Phoenix teams, his style won't work in the playoffs. Nash, Amar'e, Joe Johnson, Marion, QRich, Diaw, Barbosa, Bell, etc.