Author Topic: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31  (Read 130216 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #555 on: March 31, 2011, 10:49:27 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
The Krstic injury is a non factor. He was a terrible player and was a trainwreck on defense, his stats also were bad and he brought no intangibles to the team.

Anyone from the D-League can fill in at his playoff role as 3rd string center.

Baby/KG can play minutes at center if needed also.

I repeat again, Krstic was a scrub that brought nothing to the table, no defense, no toughness, nothing.


Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #556 on: March 31, 2011, 10:51:45 PM »

Offline PseudoElite

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 298
  • Tommy Points: 42
The Krstic injury is a non factor. He was a terrible player and was a trainwreck on defense, his stats also were bad and he brought no intangibles to the team.

Anyone from the D-League can fill in at his playoff role as 3rd string center.

Baby/KG can play minutes at center if needed also.

I repeat again, Krstic was a scrub that brought nothing to the table, no defense, no toughness, nothing.



He reduces the minutes for the O'Neals, how is that not important? They are 36 and 39.
Celtics' turn on switch for the playoffs: the last bastion of hope for battered Celtic fans.

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #557 on: March 31, 2011, 10:53:03 PM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418
The Krstic injury is a non factor. He was a terrible player and was a trainwreck on defense, his stats also were bad and he brought no intangibles to the team.

Anyone from the D-League can fill in at his playoff role as 3rd string center.

Baby/KG can play minutes at center if needed also.

I repeat again, Krstic was a scrub that brought nothing to the table, no defense, no toughness, nothing.



With no Krstic, If JO and/or SHaq arent available in the playoffs, a real possibility, were looking at Troy Murphy in the playoffs. Ouch.

Krstic was struggling but he played pretty well tonight. The real Krstic is probably somehwere in between this past week (pretty bad) and what we saw in the first 7 games with him (really really good). What he brings on offense and offensive boarding, could be very valuable in the playoffs in a reduced role.

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #558 on: March 31, 2011, 10:54:23 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
Two minor thoughts:

1) Loved Green taking it at Bonner and making him a liability.  I'd love to see more of that.  

2) Didn't like Baby on Duncan at the end of the game.  My first thought was "where is Jermaine?"  And while that may come in time, Doc really should've put KG on Duncan.  This notion that 7-1 KG (and that's his real height) isn't a center and thus should guard power forwards even when 6-6 BBD is in the game is absurd.  

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #559 on: March 31, 2011, 10:54:28 PM »

Offline Tai

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2230
  • Tommy Points: 32
The Krstic injury is a non factor. He was a terrible player and was a trainwreck on defense, his stats also were bad and he brought no intangibles to the team.

Anyone from the D-League can fill in at his playoff role as 3rd string center.

Baby/KG can play minutes at center if needed also.

I repeat again, Krstic was a scrub that brought nothing to the table, no defense, no toughness, nothing.



He reduces the minutes for the O'Neals, how is that not important? They are 36 and 39.

He just doesn't like Krstic. Live with it, man. :\

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #560 on: March 31, 2011, 11:03:13 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
Also, I didn't love Ray playing 41 minutes.  I wouldn't liked to see Doc be a little more creative and get West or Green some of those minutes.  It's no wonder his shot is off at times with the number of minutes he's playing. 

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #561 on: March 31, 2011, 11:17:10 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11472
  • Tommy Points: 5352
  • Thumper of the BASS!
Also, I didn't love Ray playing 41 minutes.  I wouldn't liked to see Doc be a little more creative and get West or Green some of those minutes.  It's no wonder his shot is off at times with the number of minutes he's playing. 


ray is prolly the most healthy balla in the league..

he can handle 41 minutes

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #562 on: March 31, 2011, 11:45:17 PM »

Offline zerophase

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2394
  • Tommy Points: 334
  • Anything's Possible
The Krstic injury is a non factor. He was a terrible player and was a trainwreck on defense, his stats also were bad and he brought no intangibles to the team.

Anyone from the D-League can fill in at his playoff role as 3rd string center.

Baby/KG can play minutes at center if needed also.

I repeat again, Krstic was a scrub that brought nothing to the table, no defense, no toughness, nothing.



He reduces the minutes for the O'Neals, how is that not important? They are 36 and 39.

He just doesn't like Krstic. Live with it, man. :\


He's just a pretend Celtics fan. Don't worry about him.

Become Legendary.

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #563 on: March 31, 2011, 11:46:55 PM »

Offline tgreanier

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 843
  • Tommy Points: 154
  • The Patron Saint of Defense
Can we trade Megatron to a Lakers board or something?
Bleeding green for 36 37 years.
"Maybe we do suck. But at least we don't wear yellow."

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #564 on: April 01, 2011, 12:01:16 AM »

Offline Q_FBE

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2317
  • Tommy Points: 243
Can we trade Megatron to a Lakers board or something?

Did his fellow Laker trolls give him his 136 points on 1280 posts?
The beatings will continue until morale improves

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #565 on: April 01, 2011, 12:04:32 AM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
Im sorry for the negative posts about Krstic, I just dont think hes any good and he makes this team worse.

Its in my opinion that if Shaq and Jermaine both regain consistent health, Krstic would be a 3rd string center at best, and those are easily replaceable, and if we just needed a big body to commit fouls, we could cut Krstic and sign a D-Leaguer.

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #566 on: April 01, 2011, 12:06:56 AM »

Offline Spicoli

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1174
  • Tommy Points: 130
Two minor thoughts:

1) Loved Green taking it at Bonner and making him a liability.  I'd love to see more of that.  

2) Didn't like Baby on Duncan at the end of the game.  My first thought was "where is Jermaine?"  And while that may come in time, Doc really should've put KG on Duncan.  This notion that 7-1 KG (and that's his real height) isn't a center and thus should guard power forwards even when 6-6 BBD is in the game is absurd.  

TP. I've been wanting to say this for a long time. Whenever KG and Davis out there, KG must switch to center! Why does Doc refuse to switch, and let Baby get owned in the paint against 7 footers? Boggles my mind.

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #567 on: April 01, 2011, 12:20:20 AM »

Offline European NBA fan

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 984
  • Tommy Points: 141
Two minor thoughts:

1) Loved Green taking it at Bonner and making him a liability.  I'd love to see more of that.  

2) Didn't like Baby on Duncan at the end of the game.  My first thought was "where is Jermaine?"  And while that may come in time, Doc really should've put KG on Duncan.  This notion that 7-1 KG (and that's his real height) isn't a center and thus should guard power forwards even when 6-6 BBD is in the game is absurd.  

TP. I've been wanting to say this for a long time. Whenever KG and Davis out there, KG must switch to center! Why does Doc refuse to switch, and let Baby get owned in the paint against 7 footers? Boggles my mind.


Big Baby is very good against big centers, who can't shoot as good as Timmy, because he can keep them out of the paint. But it would have made sense to switch tonight.

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #568 on: April 01, 2011, 12:31:55 AM »

Offline jaser

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 99
  • Tommy Points: 18
The Krstic injury is a non factor. He was a terrible player and was a trainwreck on defense, his stats also were bad and he brought no intangibles to the team.

Anyone from the D-League can fill in at his playoff role as 3rd string center.

Baby/KG can play minutes at center if needed also.

I repeat again, Krstic was a scrub that brought nothing to the table, no defense, no toughness, nothing.



He reduces the minutes for the O'Neals, how is that not important? They are 36 and 39.

He just doesn't like Krstic. Live with it, man. :\


And Rondo! I bet if Rondo had a SINGLE TURNOVER tonight, he's gonna call him out for it!  ::)

Re: Celtics (51-22) at Spurs (57-17) 3/31
« Reply #569 on: April 01, 2011, 12:40:10 AM »

Offline jaser

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 99
  • Tommy Points: 18
Am I the only one that could care less that Krstic got hurt?

I could care less, but only because I know what that phrase means.  We need quality depth up front, and Krstic provided that.  Hope he can make it back for the playoffs at least.

Great win - this team continues to step up against the elite teams in the league.  Once we got the ball moving, we out-Spurred the Spurs.  I hope we play them in the Finals - a lot less pressure for a lot of reasons.

hahahahha!!! i was waiting for this!!! yeah, i could care less too!