Author Topic: Trade Donkey and Shrek  (Read 5179 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade Donkey and Shrek
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2011, 12:10:01 PM »

Offline nba is the worst

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 836
  • Tommy Points: 75
This season's stats:


Pietrus:      7.0 PTs/2.4 RBs/0.6 ASTs
Robinson: 7.7 PTs/1.7 RBs/2.2 ASTs

Warrick:     9.5 PTs/4.0 RBs/0.6 ASTs
Davis:      12.5 PTs/5.4 RBs/1.4 ASTs

Combined (Pietrus/Warrick):    16.7 PTs/6.4 RBs/1.2 ASTs
Combined (Robinson/Davis):  20.2 PTs/7.1 RBs/3.6 ASTs


Chemistry would be affected negatively as well, (this team has great chemistry as a unit), not to mention Nate's 3-point threat and Big Baby's leading the NBA in charges, (some which have been defensive keys to many games). Sorry, but I just do not agree ... I would much rather have Nate and Baby than Pietrus and Warrick. One "Nay" vote from me. ;)



Adjusted stats for 36 mpg:

Hakim 17.4pts/7.4 reb/1.1 ast/0.4 blk
Davis 14.6/6.3/1.6/0.5
Pietrus 14.0/3.5/1.2/0.7 stl
Nate 14.6/3.2/4.1/0.8

It looks like he's right on Hakim over Glen offensively

Re: Trade Donkey and Shrek
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2011, 12:19:14 PM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
Pietrus has a 3 pt shot, but otherwise Baby is a better player.  I wouldn't do that trade.  I wouldn't trade Nate for him either, at least not until we see how Delonte works out.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Trade Donkey and Shrek
« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2011, 12:29:50 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32337
  • Tommy Points: 10099
I might agree with this proposal but why are we including a 1st rounder???
He can dunk at will on most PFs in the league, hit the open jumper including an occasional 3, and long arms to play D. He's like an unpolished poorman's KG. Warrick is a keeper.
If he were anywhere near as good as your opinion of him, he'd be starting somewhere and not a journeyman. 

Contrary to your high opinion of these two players, neither can do anything "at will" on offense.