"I love how everyone was saying they were the best team because they won 21 of 22 . They then lose to the Clippers and Lebron is out for 2 games they lose them both."
How are these two sentences related? Of the people who consider them the best team, did any of them think that the Heat could win games without Lebron?
The Heat's performance without Lebron shows us nothing. Everyone already knew they were too thin to win without Lebron. These games give us no reason to feel confident that they aren't a great team when healthy. Since Lebron's injury isn't serious, they will be healthy shortly.
These kinds of reactions feel a bit desperate to me. Why not accept that the Heat are a really good team and will be a challenge to face in the playoffs unless they are missing a key player?
Obviously the Heat are a very good team and I realize that any team without Lebron will struggle some . The point of the thread wasn't to say Miami isn't any good, it was just to show their lack of depth . If Lebron or Wade get into foul trouble ( long shot , I know) or sprain a ankle again in the playoffs they are going to have a hard time against good teams .
Plus I was more excited that they lost 3 in a row because that gives the C's an advantage going for the # 1 seed
On a side note ,their schedule during that 21 of 22 wins streak is just plain awful . They beat a Lakers team that was playing really bad going into xmas day , but the rest of the competition on that list is mediocre at best . Their other "big wins" during that streak was aginst NYK 2x and ,Utah and the Hawks .