Author Topic: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"  (Read 27870 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #105 on: December 27, 2010, 05:13:28 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
hahaha. A nice TP bouquet to BBallTim.

That is hilarious.

"I have no idea what contraction means, but just imagine if you could take Kevin Love off Minnesota and add him to another team and you shrink the league! What's that called??"

It's called the messiah asking for a pass-first PF who rebounds.
Yeah. His comments also do sound a bit like apologetics -- explaining why his move to be with Wade was such a 'great' thing for the league and should be applauded.

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #106 on: December 27, 2010, 09:15:12 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
The entire revenue model of sports teams surviving only with huge public subsidies in stadium contstruction needs to be junked.
I completely agree.  Completely

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #107 on: December 27, 2010, 09:19:03 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254


As I have said, talent is not a problem when deciding the # of teams. Finances are.
I have been arguing the same exact thing guava but some people just aren't understanding that. The league needs to contract because there are 2-3 that are just not viable as teams from a financial point of view. One team is owned by the league. Another has awful attendance, little to no local corporate help through purchased luxury boxes and has never been good but for last year. Another has to move to survive because their owners are losing money like crazy and they can't get anyone to build them a new stadium. A long time established franchise has been amongst the worst team attendance wise in the league for about a decade.

Another is moving in two years because they can't survive where they are and another two to three teams probably need to move but have no place to go. Cincinnati can barely support the Reds and Bengals. St Louis doesn't want basketball. San Diego can't support Padres. Tampa can't support the Rays. Kansas City can't support the Royals. Las Vegas is in a horrible recession and probably can no longer support a team financially.Forget Canada. Where are these severely struggling teams supposed to go?

Oklahoma City seemed pretty happy to get a team. Never thought I'd see that. Some of these teams need to go to places where people actually live.  For example. I think Columbus OH is actually a top 10 city in America....nope....wiki says 16th ahead of Charlotte, Memphis, and Boston.....maybe not the best example, but you get my drift.  San Diego is probably a better example at #8.

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #108 on: December 27, 2010, 09:47:18 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
What should I do? Should I get a dictionary and try to learn one word a day? What should I do?   Should I not pretend I am completely ignorant of a major issue in my sport less than a week after taking a public stance on said issue? What should I do?  Should I keep talking to reporters about the history of the league when I clearly think it started when I was a sophomore in high school. What should I do?

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/truehoop/miamiheat/news/story?id=5960277


Where are the people around Lebron to tell him "Shut up. Seriously. From now on all you say is stuff like "I like puppies" and "I'm praying for the troops." Don't even get into which troops or why. Just shut up"

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #109 on: December 27, 2010, 09:53:18 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
What should I do? Should I get a dictionary and try to learn one word a day? What should I do?   Should I not pretend I am completely ignorant of a major issue in my sport less than a week after taking a public stance on said issue? What should I do?  Should I keep talking to reporters about the history of the league when I clearly think it started when I was a sophomore in high school. What should I do?

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/truehoop/miamiheat/news/story?id=5960277


Where are the people around Lebron to tell him "Shut up. Seriously. From now on all you say is stuff like "I like puppies" and "I'm praying for the troops." Don't even get into which troops or why. Just shut up"

haha....

"AND DON'T CRITICIZE CHINA! DON'T! YOU DON'T DO IT!!"

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #110 on: December 28, 2010, 11:29:25 AM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448
I understand someone proably talked to him and said you have to take it back, but man, that defense really is stupid.  When athletes come up with these kind of transparent defenses to cover themselves I have to laugh.  Just stick by your opinion, I was fine with him having one.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2010, 12:22:56 PM by Snakehead »
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #111 on: December 28, 2010, 12:18:21 PM »

Offline radiohead

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7687
  • Tommy Points: 1380
I understand someone proably talked to him and said you have to take it back, but man, that defense really is stupid.  When athletes come up with these kind of transparent defenses to cover themselves I have to laugh.

I laughed pretty hard when i read that article. Lebron may be the best basketball player in the world today, but he certainly isn't the brightest bulb in the box. He took his talents to south beach but probably left his brain in Cleveland. Just wow.

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #112 on: December 28, 2010, 12:24:55 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777


As I have said, talent is not a problem when deciding the # of teams. Finances are.
I have been arguing the same exact thing guava but some people just aren't understanding that. The league needs to contract because there are 2-3 that are just not viable as teams from a financial point of view. One team is owned by the league. Another has awful attendance, little to no local corporate help through purchased luxury boxes and has never been good but for last year. Another has to move to survive because their owners are losing money like crazy and they can't get anyone to build them a new stadium. A long time established franchise has been amongst the worst team attendance wise in the league for about a decade.

Another is moving in two years because they can't survive where they are and another two to three teams probably need to move but have no place to go. Cincinnati can barely support the Reds and Bengals. St Louis doesn't want basketball. San Diego can't support Padres. Tampa can't support the Rays. Kansas City can't support the Royals. Las Vegas is in a horrible recession and probably can no longer support a team financially.Forget Canada. Where are these severely struggling teams supposed to go?

Oklahoma City seemed pretty happy to get a team. Never thought I'd see that. Some of these teams need to go to places where people actually live.  For example. I think Columbus OH is actually a top 10 city in America....nope....wiki says 16th ahead of Charlotte, Memphis, and Boston.....maybe not the best example, but you get my drift.  San Diego is probably a better example at #8.
Do those rankings only count the cities themselves? For example, does the Boston number include Cambridge? Boston itself is pretty puny.

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #113 on: December 28, 2010, 12:38:33 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.


As I have said, talent is not a problem when deciding the # of teams. Finances are.
I have been arguing the same exact thing guava but some people just aren't understanding that. The league needs to contract because there are 2-3 that are just not viable as teams from a financial point of view. One team is owned by the league. Another has awful attendance, little to no local corporate help through purchased luxury boxes and has never been good but for last year. Another has to move to survive because their owners are losing money like crazy and they can't get anyone to build them a new stadium. A long time established franchise has been amongst the worst team attendance wise in the league for about a decade.

Another is moving in two years because they can't survive where they are and another two to three teams probably need to move but have no place to go. Cincinnati can barely support the Reds and Bengals. St Louis doesn't want basketball. San Diego can't support Padres. Tampa can't support the Rays. Kansas City can't support the Royals. Las Vegas is in a horrible recession and probably can no longer support a team financially.Forget Canada. Where are these severely struggling teams supposed to go?

Oklahoma City seemed pretty happy to get a team. Never thought I'd see that. Some of these teams need to go to places where people actually live.  For example. I think Columbus OH is actually a top 10 city in America....nope....wiki says 16th ahead of Charlotte, Memphis, and Boston.....maybe not the best example, but you get my drift.  San Diego is probably a better example at #8.
Do those rankings only count the cities themselves? For example, does the Boston number include Cambridge? Boston itself is pretty puny.

The entire state of Mass and half of Conn seem like a suburb of Boston sometimes. If you don't get on the Mass Pike, and try to traverse the state you kind of never run out of suburbia.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #114 on: December 28, 2010, 01:34:44 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
I understand someone proably talked to him and said you have to take it back, but man, that defense really is stupid.  When athletes come up with these kind of transparent defenses to cover themselves I have to laugh.

I laughed pretty hard when i read that article. Lebron may be the best basketball player in the world today, but he certainly isn't the brightest bulb in the box. He took his talents to south beach but probably left his brain in Cleveland. Just wow.
TP. Well said.

Re: LeBron Says Contraction "would be great for the league"
« Reply #115 on: December 28, 2010, 05:29:22 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31742
  • Tommy Points: 3845
  • Yup
I understand someone proably talked to him and said you have to take it back, but man, that defense really is stupid.  When athletes come up with these kind of transparent defenses to cover themselves I have to laugh.

I laughed pretty hard when i read that article. Lebron may be the best basketball player in the world today, but he certainly isn't the brightest bulb in the box. He took his talents to south beach but probably left his brain in Cleveland. Just wow.

yes, and his heart in San Francisco...oh wait, he was heartless to begin with  ;)
Yup