Author Topic: What team should be relocated and where?  (Read 6848 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: What team should be relocated and where?
« Reply #30 on: December 01, 2010, 06:13:28 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Well, it seems there is language in the Hornets' current lease agreement that could allow them to relocate if the team does not draw an average crowd of over 14,213 over the course of their next 13 home games:

http://www.nola.com/hornets/index.ssf/2010/11/apparently_the_attendance_benc.html

The Hornets are currently averaging exactly 14,214 for home games (83.2% capacity).
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: What team should be relocated and where?
« Reply #31 on: December 01, 2010, 06:58:06 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20099
  • Tommy Points: 1331
It should go by percentage of capacity not total seats.

Re: What team should be relocated and where?
« Reply #32 on: December 02, 2010, 10:34:33 AM »

Offline Scout200

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 45
  • Tommy Points: 9
I think moving the Kings to San Jose...
The reasoning behind it is that Sacramento doesn't have an arena nor do they have plans for one... San Jose has an existing NBA quality arena currently used by the sharks in a major market. In this economy especially in California existing arena will be the key to relocation

Move the Clippers to Anaheim
Southern California would be great place for NBA rivalry and separate arena would allow Clips to establish its own fan base and not be as much of a little brother. Again, arena is already in place.

Move the Hornets to Seattle or Kansas City
Seattle is a good sports market and if they can get an arena. It would be good for the NBA to have team to Seattle. Kansas City, who has arena ready, would be back up if Seattle really doesn't want back in then NBA.