Author Topic: So who do we get for big baby now?  (Read 34030 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #120 on: November 16, 2010, 10:58:34 AM »

Offline Tough Juice

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 230
  • Tommy Points: 17
I'll trade him for that Jason Thompson thing in a nick of time if I had the chance

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #121 on: November 16, 2010, 11:07:10 AM »

Offline vgulab

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 442
  • Tommy Points: 54
We should't trade Davis but if we decide to trade him i have an idea.

I don't know why but Atlanta consider trading Josh Smith. I don't understand them at all , first they give Joe Johnson max deal now they might trade Josh Smith? that is terrible for them but if it's true we should try to get him. They need not one but two PF so we give them Glen Davis, Jermaine O'Neal, Nate Robinson + 1 round pick for Josh Smith.

Davis and O'Neal will be good for them at the PF position and they don't want to give J.Crawford new deal so Nate will be their bench scorer and posibly a starter there and we are giving them 1 round pick plus if they want we can include Daniels.

Rondo/Bradley
Allen/West
Pierce/Daniels?/Smith
KG/Smith
Perk/Shaq

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #122 on: November 16, 2010, 11:58:46 AM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418
I'll trade him for that Jason Thompson thing in a nick of time if I had the chance

I'm torn on this one.

I really like Thompson but why has he fallen so far down the depth chart on a bad team? Maybe there is something no one knows about with this guy.

We know what we have in BBD and he fits rather nicely. I'd hold on to him.


Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #123 on: November 16, 2010, 12:00:12 PM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545

If this conversation doesn't concern your point of view, stop jumping in and further confusing things. I tend to get involved when people make statements that have no neutral or statistical support or precedence, and, despite an absolute paucity of evidence, such people state that Davis is going to be Barkley, McHale, or Schrempf (not making any of that up). If that is not you, then don't worry about it.

Haven´t seen this post before, and since I think you`re referring to one of my earlier posts, let me say again that I was not saying Baby will be on Schrempf´s level, I said Schrempf is the perfect example of what you can accomplish in the NBA with discipline and hard work, even if you start your career as a bench player, like Schrempf did for 7 years.
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #124 on: November 16, 2010, 12:10:14 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Right now?



A strong bench PF/C.





I am against trading PF/C for SF/SG unless the SF/SG is a lot better. 

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #125 on: November 16, 2010, 12:34:41 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
Right now?



A strong bench PF/C.





I am against trading PF/C for SF/SG unless the SF/SG is a lot better. 

Yeah, I think he is basically untradable at the moment.  In February, if Perk comes back, things could change, but right now, he is too valuable to them on the court to consider trading for anything but another big man.

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #126 on: November 16, 2010, 12:48:25 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
We should't trade Davis but if we decide to trade him i have an idea.

I don't know why but Atlanta consider trading Josh Smith. I don't understand them at all , first they give Joe Johnson max deal now they might trade Josh Smith? that is terrible for them but if it's true we should try to get him. They need not one but two PF so we give them Glen Davis, Jermaine O'Neal, Nate Robinson + 1 round pick for Josh Smith.

Davis and O'Neal will be good for them at the PF position and they don't want to give J.Crawford new deal so Nate will be their bench scorer and posibly a starter there and we are giving them 1 round pick plus if they want we can include Daniels.

Rondo/Bradley
Allen/West
Pierce/Daniels?/Smith
KG/Smith
Perk/Shaq

In our dreams, maybe.

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #127 on: November 16, 2010, 01:31:57 PM »

Offline Tough Juice

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 230
  • Tommy Points: 17
We should't trade Davis but if we decide to trade him i have an idea.

I don't know why but Atlanta consider trading Josh Smith. I don't understand them at all , first they give Joe Johnson max deal now they might trade Josh Smith? that is terrible for them but if it's true we should try to get him. They need not one but two PF so we give them Glen Davis, Jermaine O'Neal, Nate Robinson + 1 round pick for Josh Smith.

Davis and O'Neal will be good for them at the PF position and they don't want to give J.Crawford new deal so Nate will be their bench scorer and posibly a starter there and we are giving them 1 round pick plus if they want we can include Daniels.

Rondo/Bradley
Allen/West
Pierce/Daniels?/Smith
KG/Smith
Perk/Shaq

this is a pipe dream

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #128 on: November 16, 2010, 01:58:20 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
We should't trade Davis but if we decide to trade him i have an idea.

I don't know why but Atlanta consider trading Josh Smith. I don't understand them at all , first they give Joe Johnson max deal now they might trade Josh Smith? that is terrible for them but if it's true we should try to get him. They need not one but two PF so we give them Glen Davis, Jermaine O'Neal, Nate Robinson + 1 round pick for Josh Smith.

Davis and O'Neal will be good for them at the PF position and they don't want to give J.Crawford new deal so Nate will be their bench scorer and posibly a starter there and we are giving them 1 round pick plus if they want we can include Daniels.

Rondo/Bradley
Allen/West
Pierce/Daniels?/Smith
KG/Smith
Perk/Shaq
I'm not comfortable trading for a player like Josh Smith and then making him come off the bench. This is not the stage in his career where that would be an option for him.

I don't see KG coming off the bench as an option either.

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #129 on: November 16, 2010, 02:39:16 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
We should't trade Davis but if we decide to trade him i have an idea.

I don't know why but Atlanta consider trading Josh Smith. I don't understand them at all , first they give Joe Johnson max deal now they might trade Josh Smith? that is terrible for them but if it's true we should try to get him. They need not one but two PF so we give them Glen Davis, Jermaine O'Neal, Nate Robinson + 1 round pick for Josh Smith.

Davis and O'Neal will be good for them at the PF position and they don't want to give J.Crawford new deal so Nate will be their bench scorer and posibly a starter there and we are giving them 1 round pick plus if they want we can include Daniels.

Rondo/Bradley
Allen/West
Pierce/Daniels?/Smith
KG/Smith
Perk/Shaq
I'm not comfortable trading for a player like Josh Smith and then making him come off the bench. This is not the stage in his career where that would be an option for him.

I don't see KG coming off the bench as an option either.
Play KG and Smith together then. KG can play most centers at a high level and Josh Smith would benefit greatly from playing with KG.

You'd have to sub in a beefier big man quickly against many teams, but other than Howard and Bogut there aren't too many match ups that'd worry me.

Atlanta is not trading Josh Smith for a backup PF/C, an injured C, a backup PG, and a first round pick.

Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #130 on: November 16, 2010, 04:28:34 PM »

Offline incoherent

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1856
  • Tommy Points: 278
  • 7 + 11 = 18
Big Baby is not, I repeat, is not expendable.

He is our 4th leading scoring and he's coming off the bench.  He shoots 55% fg 90% FT and he gets fouled alll the time.

As far as I am concerned we have Baby for a very good price and he is playing above average.

He leads the team in charges taken.. heck I think he leads the league in charges taken or is close to the top.


Re: So who do we get for big baby now?
« Reply #131 on: November 16, 2010, 04:44:42 PM »

Offline Spilling Green Dye

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1928
  • Tommy Points: 115
I want to say that Atlanta would never do that trade, but they are the same organization that gave Joe Johnson the biggest contract signed this offseason.  They overpaid for him more than Orlando overpaid for Rashard Lewis a few years ago.

If Atlanta did this trade, I'd be all for it in a heartbeat.  But again, this is an extreme longshot.

Regarding Thompson, I'm not comfortable trading Davis for a SG/SF, unless it was a multiplayer deal that gave the Celtics improved talent.  Davis is particularly valuable this regular season so that our other bigs can rest more.