CB Draft Playoff Second Round Results!

[Rondo2287]

So just a snapshot to look forward to.  The Bulls will be be referred to as communists in my argument.  And it will make sense

[Fafnir]

Number 3.  If i dont end this round with a suspension from CB I will be highly dissapointed

We can always ban you if you realy want, just ask!  

[Fafnir]

So just a snapshot to look forward to.  The Bulls will be be referred to as communists in my argument.  And it will make sense

There will still be the normal back and forth I imagine with our remaining GMs.

I just like the idea of having a place where people without the massive spare time that some of us do to get a quick look at team's strategy/lineups/matchup breakdowns.

[Roy H.]

Rondo2287:

The Conference Finals will be on Monday and the Finals on Wednesday!

As for the front page, I don't know about this year.

I do like the idea of changing format, so we're going to do it on the fly!

Every GM should prepare a case for their team, we'll post that in its own thread, then they can rebut their opposite GMs case in the same thread.

The overall Q&A flow and back and forth will be contained as usual in the playoff thread. Think of it as another press conference. I'm going to impose a word limit however, and no pictures or videos please. This is based on participant request for an easier place to locate summary arguments.

Boo, word limit!  (I personally think that if the GMs are confined to two "main" posts, they should be able to state their case as much as they want to, so long as they don't continually edit it.)

[Rondo2287]

Rondo2287:

The Conference Finals will be on Monday and the Finals on Wednesday!

As for the front page, I don't know about this year.

I do like the idea of changing format, so we're going to do it on the fly!

Every GM should prepare a case for their team, we'll post that in its own thread, then they can rebut their opposite GMs case in the same thread.

The overall Q&A flow and back and forth will be contained as usual in the playoff thread. Think of it as another press conference. I'm going to impose a word limit however, and no pictures or videos please. This is based on participant request for an easier place to locate summary arguments.

Boo, word limit!  (I personally think that if the GMs are confined to two "main" posts, they should be able to state their case as much as they want to, so long as they don't continually edit it.)

Agreed as well as pictures not of their own players should be allowed

[StartOrien]

I probably shouldn't be marketing my opponent, but I found this by google image searching 'carlos boozer sucks'and it was too good to keep to myself

[Roy H.]

I probably shouldn't be marketing my opponent, but I found this by google image searching 'carlos boozer sucks'and it was too good to keep to myself

With fan art like that, how can you vote against the guy?  He's got the heart of a grizzly!

[StartOrien]

Western Conference: All photos have to be fan art?

[indeedproceed]

I probably shouldn't be marketing my opponent, but I found this by google image searching 'carlos boozer sucks'and it was too good to keep to myself

Carlos Boozer: He doesn't just shoot lasers from his shoulders. He shoots lasers...that are full of bears!

[StartOrien]

He also spells his name exclusively on the scribe of a pirate with a quill pen.

[StartOrien]

my bad, didn't notice the swear in the hyperlink

[nickagneta]

Just to let everyone know my votes for next week currently stand at

Milwaukee
Phoenix

So Roy and IP, if you want my vote, you have a LOT of work to do.

So you're not going to vote before any debate happens this time?

Not sure.

I didn't need to hear the debate in previous rounds because my mind was already made up. No amount of debate was going to change my mind so I voted early.

But I'm less sure this time.

One of these clubs I have pretty much 98% made up my mind. The other I am very, very undecided on and a good argument could persuade me. So I will probably hold off and do some reading this time.

[Fafnir]

Rondo2287:

The Conference Finals will be on Monday and the Finals on Wednesday!

As for the front page, I don't know about this year.

I do like the idea of changing format, so we're going to do it on the fly!

Every GM should prepare a case for their team, we'll post that in its own thread, then they can rebut their opposite GMs case in the same thread.

The overall Q&A flow and back and forth will be contained as usual in the playoff thread. Think of it as another press conference. I'm going to impose a word limit however, and no pictures or videos please. This is based on participant request for an easier place to locate summary arguments.

Boo, word limit!  (I personally think that if the GMs are confined to two "main" posts, they should be able to state their case as much as they want to, so long as they don't continually edit it.)

Well the initial request is for a brief case to sum up why they should vote for such and such team.

I can do without the word limit. No pictures/videos though, I'm pretty sure on that one.

[Fafnir]

I probably shouldn't be marketing my opponent, but I found this by google image searching 'carlos boozer sucks'and it was too good to keep to myself

With fan art like that, how can you vote against the guy?  He's got the heart of a grizzly!

Why would you want the heart of an NBA franchise that has never won a single playoff game?

[Rondo2287]

Hey Faf..

Wondering if we could possibly open up the argument thread tomorrow?  I will be pretty busy at work on monday and would like to be able to get pen to paper tomorrow and get the ball rolling.