Press Conference Schedule is Up! 2010 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Board

[indeedproceed]

I'm gonna go with Carlos Arroyo and Reggie Evans.

Arroyo would've been one of my last 3 picks.

[Fafnir]

The commish has lunch and then another meeting today. So IP and Roy are going to have to handle things for the next few hours.

[Roy H.]

I'm fine with the draft restarting whenever Lucky is ready.  (It's my understanding that he has 11.1, rather than greenbean.)

[indeedproceed]

The commish has lunch and then another meeting today. So IP and Roy are going to have to handle things for the next few hours.

Whoopty Whoop!

This means if you take the guy I want at 11(30) or 12(1), I will refuse to acknowledge it.

[riah32]

anyone interest in Smith and Outlaw send a pm my way...looking for a starting Sf in return. Doesnt have to good just has to get the job done.

[Gainesville Celtic]

boring   

UBUNTU y'all!!



ps. Denver Nuggetzz Rulesz!

[Lucky17]

Sorry, but I'm still waiting on replies to my PMs.

GC, come join me in chat and shoot the breeze with me.

[Roy H.]

I'm bored.  I'm opening the Sacramento Kings up to trades:

C: Dampier / Bargnani
PF: Boozer
SF: Lewis / Jefferson
SG: Garcia
PG: Rose

Goals:

1.  The Kings have to stay competitive in the short term;

2.  The Kings are willing to trade excellent players for multiple good ones.

[nickagneta]

I'm bored.  I'm opening the Sacramento Kings up to trades:

C: Dampier / Bargnani
PF: Boozer
SF: Lewis / Jefferson
SG: Garcia
PG: Rose

Goals:

1.  The Kings have to stay competitive in the short term;

2.  The Kings are willing to trade excellent players for multiple good ones.

Is this really a good idea if you aren't actually taking over the team?

[Gainesville Celtic]

Sorry, but I'm still waiting on replies to my PMs.

GC, come join me in chat and shoot the breeze with me.

would love to but leaving for a meeting now.... then to   teach a class.

[Roy H.]

I'm bored.  I'm opening the Sacramento Kings up to trades:

C: Dampier / Bargnani
PF: Boozer
SF: Lewis / Jefferson
SG: Garcia
PG: Rose

Goals:

1.  The Kings have to stay competitive in the short term;

2.  The Kings are willing to trade excellent players for multiple good ones.

Is this really a good idea if you aren't actually taking over the team?

The Commissioner's Office has owned the team for several rounds now.  To help preserve the integrity of the game, I'm trying to field a roster that has more than 7 rotation-caliber players.

[nickagneta]

I'm bored.  I'm opening the Sacramento Kings up to trades:

C: Dampier / Bargnani
PF: Boozer
SF: Lewis / Jefferson
SG: Garcia
PG: Rose

Goals:

1.  The Kings have to stay competitive in the short term;

2.  The Kings are willing to trade excellent players for multiple good ones.

Is this really a good idea if you aren't actually taking over the team?

The Commissioner's Office has owned the team for several rounds now.  To help preserve the integrity of the game, I'm trying to field a roster that has more than 7 rotation-caliber players.

The Kings still have 4 more picks I think. That's what the last GM decided was best for his team.

Trading off his best players for some good players doesn't make his team more or less competitively balanced.

I just think the Commissioner's office deciding where the Kings best players can be traded to and what is a viable trade for them isn't in the best interest of the league as a whole.

[Lucky17]

I'll be making a selection at 11.1 if I don't receive a trade offer to my liking.

Pick is due in 10 minutes.

[Roy H.]

Clarification on what the Kings are looking for:

They need a PF back, and multiple players selected in the top five rounds. 

This isn't a "fire sale" in the sense that I'm going to take poor value.  However, if somebody can make a mutually beneficial offer, feel free to do so.

[Roy H.]

I'm bored.  I'm opening the Sacramento Kings up to trades:

C: Dampier / Bargnani
PF: Boozer
SF: Lewis / Jefferson
SG: Garcia
PG: Rose

Goals:

1.  The Kings have to stay competitive in the short term;

2.  The Kings are willing to trade excellent players for multiple good ones.

Is this really a good idea if you aren't actually taking over the team?

The Commissioner's Office has owned the team for several rounds now.  To help preserve the integrity of the game, I'm trying to field a roster that has more than 7 rotation-caliber players.

The Kings still have 4 more picks I think. That's what the last GM decided was best for his team.

Trading off his best players for some good players doesn't make his team more or less competitively balanced.

I just think the Commissioner's office deciding where the Kings best players can be traded to and what is a viable trade for them isn't in the best interest of the league as a whole.

I'm *shocked* that you would object to something the Commish's Office was doing, nick.  Shocked!